- NEW!
by Juno66 on June 14th, 2009
No, it's cheaper for them to keep someone hopeful that they will actually get a permanent job with some benefits until the time comes that the temp expects it and then they replace them with a new crew of hopefuls. Great moral practice, don't you think?! A$$holes! I know someone that's basically working for a temp agency now, it's like clockwork; she gets a job, they tell her she'll be permanent for 3 months, sometimes they tell her they can't just yet after the 3 months are up, but will in another 3 months. She stays another 3 months hoping they will and then, boom; they don't need her so the temp agency places her at another job where they do they same thing! It's cheaper for the company! It sucks and it's wrong. I don't know how they live with themselves using people that way!
by Mosexy on June 14th, 2009
no, it's always cheaper to use people than it is to treat them properly.
How do i fill out a u. s. government job application?
by Answerbag Staff on April 20th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What do employer ads mean when they want this requirement;
Seeking customer service attitude?Is that the same as seeking a doormat?
by Spice* on January 17th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
What should a personal portfolio contain?
by Answerbag Staff on April 3rd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Is it more difficult for a teenager in the U.S.A. to find a job now than it was in the 50's?
by cloudman on December 17th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Do you feel that me, who has been unemployed 1 yr 3 months and other unemployed folks will find employment in 2012?
by Secretive Woman on January 5th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Temp agencies here hire people 90 days & then let them go & replace them so companies don't have to pay benefits. Would it not be cheaper rather than having to re train every 90 days to pay benefits & keep people who WANT to work?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
I know. I just lost a GREAT awesome job because they decided to use a temp agency. The thing is I was only to going to work 1 day a week. I would have gotten nothing and yet it didn't matter..around here you can't get a job without using a temp agency and then those that really want to work they don't send out and if they do they replace them after 90 days. It is wrong and I wish that laws would be passed to stop it. Thank you
by Scrappy on June 14th, 2009
I'm afraid there are no morals left in the world. That's very wrong.
by Juno66 on June 24th, 2009