Business
 
Question:
Avatar

In a free enterprise system companies that do not supply a quality product for a long period of time,or is mismanaged, usually go bankrupt and cease to exist.Is it time for GM to cease to exist?

By jin jang Asked May 27 2009 6:11PM
12
Pts
 
 
Rate Question
Answer Question Help someone!
Get the latest questions in Business
flag

Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sign up now to ask a question or help someone else by giving an answer!

signup now
Sort answers by: Rating | DateArrow Down
 

Top Answer out of 6

by Kizz miazz on May 28, 2009 at 8:45 pm Permalink

Avatar
It's past that time. They should have slowly changed from making cars to something else and moved into the 21st century. They still operate like it's 1965 and that's why they are going under.

Many companies during WWII went from making sewing machines to making machine guns. Some times you just have to make the transition. But when companies are run by fat cats who fleece the government and the people it will catch up to them.

I feel they conspired with the oil companies for so many years and held back developments in energy and technology. With the help of our government who had individuals in it prosper by this.

So now our economy has suffered and the environment has suffered from a few greedy men.
6
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 2 out of 6

by mrbuddhafreak on May 27, 2009 at 9:17 pm Permalink

Avatar
The sad answer is, probably. The auto companies that had swallowed up all their competition until there was only the Big Three probably would do well to be broken up and build from the beginning. Unfortunately this would be enough to probably cause another recession on its own.
6
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 3 out of 6

by THE ROOKIE on May 27, 2009 at 9:25 pm Permalink

Avatar
NO!
There are over 1,000.000 jobs tied to the auto industry, and it is not just the sulppiers either. It is the Rail road, Fed Ex, The Shipping yards at the docks and ports,The resturants, stores located by the plants not just the Big plants but the plants of the little shops that make the car parts. and that is not good at all.
Not only the dollars buy the Cutomers,
IT is also the taxes the come form the business as well that will be lost.

WE as a nation will not be able to surport all the NEw unempolyeed.
5
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar LaissezErik May, 27 2009 at 09:31 PM
Nor SHOULD "we as a nation" have to support the unemployed. It is conventional wisdom that one keep six months of salary in savings, enough to hold one over until new employment is found. With the unreasonably high salaries some of these people were making, they had ample opportunity to do just that--instead of buying houses, cars, tvs, and other toys they could make the payments on but couldn't really afford. It is not my fault that someone else has "fallen on hard times" (practically jumped on them, generally) and I shouldn't have to support them under threat of force.
Avatar THE ROOKIE May, 27 2009 at 10:23 PM
the empolyees at the small shops and stores does not make more than Min wage.(if lucky a dollar or two more) and are mostly part time. and are non union.
WE should get rid of the union all together. that would be a better choice. what Union wants the Union gets. I have seen it alright some of the unions guys come back late form lunch and still have a job. not cool not all.
I agree that we should have savings, but I know I went through mine in four instead of eight. not cool when prices of food, gas, etc keep on going up. ( besides I was smart butt I had paid off a charge card and more towards the house note before the layoff so that took a chunk out)I am glad I did .

Answer 4 out of 6

by Tveg on May 28, 2009 at 8:38 pm Permalink

Avatar
Since the taxpayers are the primary share holders, at this time, it would be counter-productive. Time to revamp, find some good management, get the pay for all involved to reasonable levels, and turn it around.
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 5 out of 6

by LaissezErik on May 27, 2009 at 9:14 pm Permalink

Avatar
I was going to say absolutely, but after considering Jim's response, I can't. The taxpayers, of course, should not have a stake in the company to begin with, but that not being the case...what an altogether awful situation. I still hope it fails, frankly. Galt's Gulch, make room for me!
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 6 out of 6

by Jim in a Nautilus COAT on May 27, 2009 at 9:09 pm Permalink

Avatar
Not while we taxpayers have a majority stake in it. Bad idea.
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)


Add an Answer

In a free enterprise system companies that do not supply a quality product for a long period of time,or is mismanaged, usually go bankrupt and cease to exist.Is it time for GM to cease to exist?

How to write a good answer
Your answer:

Display answer in fixed-width font (good for tables or text diagrams)

Answers must adhere to our Terms of Use

To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. Use the Preview button at the bottom to verify.

You can edit your answer at any time.

Add Video Add Iimage


Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.