by Marguerite on May 13th, 2009

Marguerite

Question

Help answer this question below.

Why isn't there hair under Jesus's arm pits or his chest in paintings of the crucifixion?(I'm drawing hair in those places on my painting!)

Answers. 3 helpful answers below.

  • by CurtisNeeley on June 16th, 2009

    CurtisNeeley

    I believe the painters were attempting to remove sexuality, while at the same time making the body look more innocent. Few paintings of the crucifixion depict Jesus' penis or pubic hair either. He was hung naked. To be completely realistic he must be drawn nude. Perhaps there are times that realism detracts from the art.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by JakobA I^_^I the alooney on May 13th, 2009

    JakobA I^_^I the alooney

    Probably because it is hard to make such sparse hair on the plaster statuettes placed on crucifixes, so the artists all grew up thinking of him as hairless there.

    But it might be deliberate, hair usually comes with puberty and all the attendant sinful sexuality. But Jesus (by definition) never had any of that, so his purity could be symbolized by painting him hairless.

    Might be a good idea to investigate further, lest you unwittingly offend.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on May 13th, 2009

    Anonymous

    Probably a subtle way of making him look cleaner, more pure...

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Why isn't there hair under Jesus's arm pits or his chest in paintings of the crucifixion?(I'm drawing hair in those places on my painting!)

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Crucified pubic
Never had hair under arms
Hair under his arms
Armpits for jesus
Drawing hair jesus