by phil96 on April 14th, 2009

phil96

Question

Help answer this question below.

If "discedere debeo" in latin means "I ought to leave", what about "discedere non debeo"? Is it "I ought not to leave (I should stay)" or "I do not need to leave"? Does "non" negate the action or the obligation?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 3 helpful answers below.

  • by dea_ex_machina on December 5th, 2009

    dea_ex_machina

    As I see it, it negates the obligation. If it were to negate the action, it would be "non discedere debeo", meaning I ought to not leave, rather than I ought not to leave.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Jerrykim on July 8th, 2009

    Jerrykim

    Puzzling, almost philosophical debate, on this subject. Very precisely, you're asking if "discedere non debeo" means "I ought not to leave" (I shouldn't do the leaving, but perhaps someone else should) or "I ought to leave not" (I should do something, but not leaving, meaning that whatever I do must result in me staying). I would have to delve more deeply into my Arnold's Latin Prose Composition for a reliable answer, if there is one. For now I think either way the original sense is the same, or very similar.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by iwnit on April 16th, 2009

    iwnit

    I don't have to leave. (as far as I remember)

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading If "discedere debeo" in latin means "I ought to leave", what about "discedere non debeo"? Is it "I ought not to leave (I should stay)" or "I do not need to leave"? Does "non" negate the action or the obligation?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Ought in latin
Debeo latin translation
Debeo latin
Latin ought
Latin to leave leaving