by Sodahead on April 11th, 2009

Sodahead

Question

Help answer this question below.

Is the rumor that everyone in the US will be required to have flood insurance correct?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 17 helpful answers below.

  • by Glenn Blaylock on April 11th, 2009

    Glenn Blaylock

    Personally, I find that a bit hard to believe. Flood insurance only makes sense if you live someplace that is subject to flooding. There are many, many places where this really isn't a danger. So, it would be quite unfair to require the people living in such places to buy the insurance.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Bakebyday still baking.. on April 11th, 2009

    Bakebyday still baking..

    Well I live in the desert. They will have a hard time enforcing that one. It rains maybe twice a year.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Someguy on April 11th, 2009

    Someguy

    The government offers very cheap flood insurance if you live in a high risk flood zone. I could see them making it mandatory in those zones, but not everywhere.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Jane on April 11th, 2009

    Jane

    i doubt everyone. I live in a very dry area. it doesn't rain or get very cold often.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Ironhead on April 11th, 2009

    Ironhead

    Not for everyone....I do though because I do live in a flood zone and it darn near got me last year.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by DA BEN DAN yanggui zi on April 11th, 2009

    DA BEN DAN yanggui zi

    I would tend to doubt its veracity. There are many places in the US which flooding doesn't occur. That is sort of like having tornado insurance in Seattle...

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Corgingus on April 11th, 2009

    Corgingus

    Only those that live in a flood zone.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by j ninja... on April 11th, 2009

    j ninja...

    Right now my back yard looks like I need some. :(

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by -Ben 10- on April 11th, 2009

    -Ben 10-

    Not everyone but it's good for those who live in flood prone zones..

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on April 11th, 2009

    Anonymous

    Unlikely. My apartment is several feet above the river and I am likely to move soon into a aparment on the second level of a building on a hillside. If floodwaters reach up there then most of the two would be well submerged.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by wing.walker on April 11th, 2009

    wing.walker

    No. Incorrect.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by gtravels loves her life penguin on April 11th, 2009

    gtravels loves her life penguin

    The people living on the 15th floor of the apartment building down the block would be pretty peeved to hear that;)

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by schmee2369 on April 11th, 2009

    schmee2369

    I dont understand why people HAVETA have flood insurance....its their house, if they wanna loose it...then fine....dont make them pay for something every month (or however)...if they dont want to....they have a choice.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by nutmegcollector on April 11th, 2009

    nutmegcollector

    I doubt it. Why do it need flood insurance if I live on top of the mountain?

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Merriment on November 30th, 2009

    Merriment

    It is already required in most states to have flood insurance if you reside in a flood zone and are seeking financing. Especially Federal financing programs like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
    And the flood zones were being widened.

    This was as a result of flood insurance being voluntary and many people choosing not to have coverage and losing all and the banks losing their equity.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by philosopher-saint on November 30th, 2009

    philosopher-saint

    Boy! If it is I betcha the hilltop folks'll be pissed!
    ;-)

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Henderson on April 11th, 2009

    Henderson

    no problem, I already having it.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Is the rumor that everyone in the US will be required to have flood insurance correct?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads