by 
anonymous
ANSWERS: 9
-
yes, I think so but the government of the USA and its allies are trying to stop them to get one ready to destroy.
-
No. 1. Such weapons were never found; not by the team of experts before the war, nor by the US/UK troops after/during the current war. 2. Iraq never had the full-fledged capability of building such weapons. 3. Although it could have acquired such weapons from countries like USSR Saddam would not have been averse to use it in air strikes against Israel. But he did not do so shows not his intent but rather his capability.
-
There may of been rumored there was ,but i honestly think there wasnt.He wanted to go in there and finish daddys job he couldnt do and he wont finish it either unless he uses nuclear weapons of mass destruction on them..So thanks alot george bush for killing are people for no reason.
-
180,000 dead Kurds would say "yes". Many ex-communist countries sold them to Iraq, who then moved them into Syria and from there, who knows?
-
Yes and there were WMD found so I have no idea why liberals keep insisting that they weren't.
-
No but I think the U.S. is looking for something else.
-
I think there may have been WMD.. that doesn't mean just bombs.. it could be germs, disease etc. When the U.N. went looking for them, they were not allowed into MANY facilites, and always gave them 2 weeks notice of their arrival to inspect... plenty of time for them to hide any evidence or put it where the UN wasn't allowed to look. Let alone put it where the U.N. already looked.. Hide and seek with no rules for the Iraqs.
-
I know there was. I was there and saw them. The next day there was a 2 paragraph blurb about it in the Kuwaiti Times but none of the worldwide media ran with the story. I always wondered why. Maybe they were told not to?
-
At one point in history, yes. Recently? Not really. But they never really wanted to find any.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC