- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Should we let convicts decide their own punishment? Read description before replying.
by Ombliss22 on December 14th, 2011
| 2 people like this
In prison is it wise to sleep on your back and rope the soap?
by -O-uknow on February 12th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Is it racist that convicted criminals aren't allowed to vote?
by Ombliss22 on November 21st, 2011
| 7 people like this
How do Florida courts deal with 21+ year olds who "tag" property with graffiti? What would justice require? Jail? restitution? Both?
by GibsonGuy on March 9th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Do inmates still break rocks in the prisons in America?
by formichinoo on January 30th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading SHould convicts be sent for psychatric treatment and not to prisons?
Comments
I have to say,I really don't like this answer.The fact is MOST convicted felons are not mean nor a threat to your little world.
by janacide on January 21st, 2007
yes, I agree with janacide. There are criminals who didnt have a choice.
by Carluck on January 21st, 2007
I have to say, I really DO like this answer. Jana, you are incredibly clueless, and arrogant. The "fact" is? You have no idea. You have been fooled. Some convicts act like nice guys, until you give them a chance to do something else bad. They're not in prison because they were simply, "misunderstood"... They are there because they committed a crime, and they probably have done it more than once. "Most" people don't go to prison on there first offence. Maybe you should be locked in a room full of convicts, and see how "nice" they are to you...Would you trust them? Or would you assume that they would do something "mean" to you? Think about it.
by Castrate on January 21st, 2007
Its not my little world, its your little world and i do not believe you have the experience to make this statement. i have arrested at least 6,000 felons in 41 years, so i believe i can base my answer on personal experience. yes, some criminals need psychological evaluation to determine their mental status. the vast majority receive this evaluation, paid for by each state. i say again, most convicted felons are just mean people that do not work and depend on their crimes to afford them the good life and/or drugs at your expense. i have much more information to give, concerning this situation, if you desire. my answers are based again, on facts, not just an opinion. my little world is also your little world. i protect the people and their property. if you have never been a victim of a serious crime, i guess thats your basis for your comment.
by Anonymous on January 21st, 2007
POint well taken. Experience speaks a lot.
by Carluck on January 21st, 2007
I commend you for helping to make this place a little safer, john pennington.
by Castrate on January 21st, 2007
B.S.I am far from clueless or arrogant.And I am NOT in-experienced.Castrate,He didn't say convicts...he said convicted felons.BIG DIFFERENCE.Just because they are convicted felons does not make them mean or a threat.MOST are not even in jail.And John,I am not personally attacking you.I just didn't like your answer so no need to get defensive.I think it is predjudice and judgemental and I find it hard to believe that your statement is based on facts.But if it is,then yes,I would like to see them.
by janacide on January 21st, 2007
How naive you are. A convict, can simply mean a person "convicted" of a felony/offense. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/convict
Besides, we are discussing convicts (see the question),not adolescent teens! And yes, you are being very arrogant, calling your silly statement a "fact", and saying you know more about it then john pennington (or at least that's how you're coming across)...My statement still stands, and I would believe john over you any day. Experience speaks for itself.
by Castrate on January 21st, 2007
I think if you would have said "Hardened Criminals"I may have agreed with your blanketed statement.
by janacide on January 21st, 2007
Oh,and I didn't mean to piss off the guy who obviosly has a thing for you.
by janacide on January 21st, 2007
there is enough hate in the world without answerbag people joining the crowd. if it takes withdrawing my answer completely, i will. this is an open forum for people to discus issues, not be part of the problem.
by Anonymous on January 22nd, 2007
I agree,and I think I would still like to get my point across without a 17 yr. old know-it-all interupting me with his overbearing attitude.
by janacide on January 22nd, 2007
Interrupting you? You're joking, right? This is the internet...I didn't "interrupt" you in any way, shape, or form. Just because I disagree with you, and let you know it, doesn't mean that I'm "interrupting" you. Just because I countered your arguments, to the point that you can't really say anything else, doesn't mean you should start pointing fingers. I understand it's upsetting when you talk as if you know what the word convict means, and then somebody shows you that all along, you didn't have a clue...Especially when you were being so arrogant about it. I take it you're being like that because I accused you of being clueless, and arrogant, right? Well, you're doing a good job backing up that statement...Keep it up.
by Castrate on January 22nd, 2007
All you did was prove my point,so quit trying to make an arguement out of something that you know nothing about.
by janacide on January 23rd, 2007
Haha, OK, you're just being ignorant now. By the way, did you even read what the definition of "convict" is? If you did, then you would have seen that you were wrong, and that I was right. That kind of "proves" you wrong, and me right. But I doubt you're intelligent enough to understand, so I'll just let you keep thinking that you somehow magically "proved" me wrong...I hope you're just trying to annoy me by the way. Because if you really do believe that you somehow "proved" me wrong, then you really need some help.
by Castrate on January 23rd, 2007
Okay, Castrate, you win. Please, stop arguing.
by tt010101 on January 24th, 2007
Okay, janacide, you win. Please, stop arguing.
by tt010101 on January 24th, 2007
No,I really don't think it is as much me being ignorant as it is you being narrow and only capable of seeing YOUR side of the coin.Basically it is a waste of anyones time trying to have a discussion where you are involved because people like that are only interested in arguements and thier own much loved point of view.I think that someday if you learned how to look at both sides of the coin and actually considered what other people where saying ,instead of PUSHING your opinions down peoples throats and calling people names like a child would,you may be good at having a mature debate or discussion.Much luck to you;)
by janacide on January 24th, 2007
Eventually one of you will have to be the bigger person and stop arguing.
by tt010101 on January 24th, 2007
Psychade:It is not important to me to win,what was important to me was to let John know that I took offence to his answer; because I felt that by saying that convicted felons were just mean people and a threat to society,was almost as bad as saying that gay men have aids.I believe that convicts bieng talked about here ,in the question,was refering to hard core criminals,not just mere "convicted felons"There are TONS of people around that have a felony from one stupid mistake,and I don;t believe John was talking about those people either,but regardless,he summed them all up into the violent criminal catergory as if people with a felony record don't have a hard enough time finding a job or living a real life again.I just wish he would have worded it differently is all.And that is all I was trying to say.Thanks.
by janacide on January 24th, 2007
Someone else(DUH) turned it into an arguement before I could even give my reason to John why i didnt like his answer,and instead was being insulted by a boy for stating my opinion,and that,in my opinion,is B.S.He basically turned what could have been an enlightening disscusion between a police officer and a felon(yes,I have a felony)into a boyish game of meaningless nonsense.
by janacide on January 24th, 2007
Janacide, I find it funny, that you're calling me immature, yet you were the one claiming "facts" as if you knew what you were talking about. How am I acting any different than you? You are obviously not willing to see any other point of view, except your own. The question was about convicts, and I think we both know that John was talking about convicts, not adolescent teenagers, as I have stated earlier. So, here you are picking at "words" and getting all technical on John, when you didn't even know the meaning of the word "convict"! Ha, don't make me laugh...Now do you want me to be the "bigger" person here, and just leave this argument? Or would you like to have the honors? Because this isn't getting us anywhere.
by Castrate on January 24th, 2007
No,I will be the bigger person,you can be right,and I will just crawl off and be the "stupid, ignorant,clueless,arrogant,naive girl that you wish me to be."Stick a fork in youself,because you are done.
by janacide on January 24th, 2007
Oh that's classy. Leave with your last words being every insult/truth I said about you. I'll do the same. I'll just be the narrow minded, interrupting, overbearing, know it all, that is right. Good day.
by Castrate on January 24th, 2007