Some think some practices in Scientology encourages brainwashing. The idea of going "Clear," to some, is seen as a way to brainwash someone, not rid their mind of negativity, but ready it for future manipulation. Although getting rid of negative thought patterns can be a useful psychological tool, some think that Scientology does it in a way to hook a person in and prepare them for future mind-control.
Others think that the idea that one can control one's environment as opposed to be controlled by it seems an encouragement to take on more God-like powers. The new age idea of being a person who makes things happen instead of a person in which things happen to can be foreign to a passive submissive who allows the world to bash and pummel one's ship out at sea, needing God to save him/her. Both extremes can be unhealthy. To think that we have control over nothing makes us victims; to think we have control over everything gives us a false sense of security and arrogance. To my knowledge, Scientology sits at one extreme of this continuum and doesn't acknowledge the idea that there are some things in life beyond one's control.
Others are turned off by Scientology for the simple fact that, in order to advance or benefit, one must pay money. This doesn't seem like a religion, but more of a form of service or psychology that one would pay to better oneself. I know of no other religion in the world who asks their congregation to pay money to advance spiritually, or self-improve. Donations or tithing can be encouraged, yes, but I have heard of no other religion in which it was a requirement to pay to advance to the next level mentally, spiritually or emotionally. The fact that they require money to advance to the next levels of their program seems to an indication that the group is more of a self-improvement or psychology-based institution than a religion. The fact that Scientology uses their religion status to help people improve themselves but then require money to advance is a cause of great concern and alarm, and should be a red flag to most people. Religion is an institution that is there, ideally, to help people advance spiritually, irregardless of how much money they have to contribute to their religion.
L. Ron Hubbard, the author of Dianetics of which Scientology is based on, has also called homosexuality an aberration. Being I have met others in my life who were very unhappy trying to live a life incongruent with who they are (by for instance, trying to be heterosexual), and didn't feel happy until they honored their homosexuality, I find this position of Dianetics grossly inaccurate. Notice that it is usually heterosexuals who make such broad, inaccurate generalizations about homosexuals.
Scientology would be a more effective organization if they called a heart a heart and a spade a spade. They would gain more validity and trust, specifically, if they labeled themselves as a self-help or self-improvement group who provides a service as opposed to a religion - but then again, they would not get as many tax breaks. They either need to choose to call themselves a religion and provide a mental, emotional, and/or spiritual service and don't charge money to advance, or they need to lose the religion and call themselves what they are - a self-betterment/improvement group.
Comments