To my sense whatever we see in universe might be a small particle of a still large body and conversly a small particle (electron or photon) may contain in them still smaller universe.... Do you agree with me ? Please share your ideas...
by 
Silli
ANSWERS: 4
-
could be true- could be false- could be tralse. who knows amigo,who really knows?
-
I wholeheartedly agree with that concept... I actually thought of it, just forgot to patent it LOL
-
You are right in some sense. However, most physicists believe that at a certain point on the scale of small things, you can no longer sub-divide particles. There is what is referred to as a fundamental particle. For the last 30 years or so, the so-called "Standard Model" has described each of the particles which can no longer be sub-divided into smaller pieces. Examples are: the electron, the photon, and six types of quarks. There's reason to believe that these particles really are fundamental, and are not composed of more pieces, though I admit that I don't really understand the argument other than "they haven't ever broken apart in existing accelerators". On the larger scale, telescopes can see pretty close to the edge of the known Universe now, and there doesn't appear to be anything bigger than a "foamy" arrangement of galactic superclusters and filaments of matter. However, the entire known Universe may be a part of something else. It might be impossible to know.
-
Not entirely the same but you may be interested in learning about the Holographic Universe idea. Try David Bohm as a starter.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC