- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Obama ate dinner. Bush's fault?
by Cal on December 25th, 2011
| 3 people like this
Where was God's alleged love when he threw Job up as a pawn in a bet?
by Want To Sleep With A Miner on September 14th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Should George W Bush go into one of those countries with warrants out for his arrest, surrounded by Secret Service, Marines, and Green
by Want To Sleep With A Miner on December 23rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What does AB need to change to make the site, 'better'?
by Cal on December 18th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Are you concerned that another 2.6 million Americans slipped into poverty during the past year? Median household income fell to 1997 level
by GibsonGuy on September 15th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Are there reasons why people don't like george bush besides iraq?
Comments
you left out his repeal of environmental laws that hurt big business, falsifying reasons to go into iraq, etc.. good start though.. :)
by benjamin123 on January 24th, 2007
Oh, you're right, I just got tired of writing!! The way he turned a beautiful surplus into a gigantic deficit---the trashing of so many environmental laws---the repeated attacks on Social Security and Medicare---the tax breaks for the fabulously wealthy---the phony "no child left behind" educational laws that are making things worse than they were before---and more, and more---but I got tired. :(
by Ankhorite on January 24th, 2007
The question asks for reasons, I gave reasons -- and I keep getting downrated just for answering the question! The downrate should be used to express support for Bush; it should only be used if the downrater thinks I didn't answer the question AS IT WAS ASKED. Sheesh!
by Ankhorite on January 26th, 2007
Errr...that "the downrate should NOT be used to express support for Bush." :)
by Ankhorite on January 26th, 2007
aye.. down rating is for bad answers.. not answers you disagree with.. though.. sometimes it is tempting.
by benjamin123 on January 26th, 2007
What a beautiful answer. I wish to fornicate with it.
by Halskiisaklink on January 28th, 2007
very good points!
by yoho05 reminds you to DYOH on January 28th, 2007
Sakahlinski, ummm... yes, thank you, I'm sure! :) YoHoHo, thank you very much; and oLuckBoy, I appreciate the continued support.
by Ankhorite on January 28th, 2007
You have just about said it all.Congrats
by jin jang on January 29th, 2007
Thank you, MrLogic. Encouraging words make me willing to keep answering political questions, despite the repercussions. :)
by Ankhorite on January 29th, 2007
Bravo Ankhorite!!!!! Beautifully said!!!
by Journo on January 29th, 2007
He is a bible-thumping neanderthal who belongs at a monster truck show, not the white house.
by J and B on May 21st, 2007
oo long answer...
hah
by fuzzy_rabbit on May 22nd, 2007
Thank you, Journo. Of course, the answer is five months old now — I could now add things like, "perverting the Department of Justice to make it an illegal tool of discrimination against voters who live in Democratic areas, and firing professional prosecutors who refuse to participate in something this dishonest." Oh, I could keep going, but it's bad for my blood pressure. THIS is what impeachment is for.
by Ankhorite on May 23rd, 2007
The problem is, If he gets impeached, Cheney becomes president! What a scary thought.
by KevinW42 on August 9th, 2007
Great answer, Ankhorite. I remember Karla Faye Tucker, a rehabilitated and reformed convict if ever there was one, how he mimicked her voice "Don't kill me" before the execution. I kind of overall loathe the guy.
by Amorphous Blob on August 9th, 2007
aww cry us a river why dont you.
by charliethegreat on November 3rd, 2008
It shows him to be a cruel a-hole instead of the good guy his supporters claim. Minor point compared with the rest of the damage he's done.
by Amorphous Blob on November 3rd, 2008
I've heard that the No Child Left Behind programme didn't do a lot of good.
by Halskiisaklink on November 3rd, 2008
Thanks, Blob, Rudeboy (so nice to see "frotteurs" get some air time!) The NCLB program essentially punishes poor schools for being poor. It was a lousy idea and has had lousy results. Schools are trying to dump children with disabilities in order to get them out of their statistics -- yet the past thirty years of public policy has been to INTEGRATE these kids with the main school system ("mainstreaming") because that's the way they learn best how to join society after school ends. Bush is a five-star idiot, and, as Blob noted, cruel. And selfish, and irresponsible, and deeply, irremediably, stupid.
by Ankhorite on November 3rd, 2008
Thank you. I agree, Frotteurs are ill-represented in society. But it's not as if Bush drafted this legislation himself.
by Halskiisaklink on November 3rd, 2008
The worst part IMO is that he's *intentionally* and enthusiastically ignorant for political and theological reasons.
.
My daughter's just in 3rd grade, and we live in the burbs, so I don't know much about the No Child Left Behind program, but just as an FYI, I was talking w/ a guy whose daughter's in a diffent school district. There are some families in subsidized apartments whose kids go to their school, and he was saying that the de facto effect of the program was to require everybody to slow down to the slowest kids' level. His daughter was even getting 2 recess hours per day (in 3rd grade). I don't know what the best answer to the problem is.
by Amorphous Blob on November 3rd, 2008
Eh, most primary school kids in Australia get around 90 minutes of lunch/recess. Noam Chomsky thinks he's been trained to come across as illiterate and ignorant - which makes a bit of sense, considering his university education.
by Halskiisaklink on November 3rd, 2008
*** From May 21, 2007, accidentally added as new answer instead of comment on this one:*** Thank you, Journo. Of course, the answer is five months old now — I could now add things like, "perverting the Department of Justice to make it an illegal tool of discrimination against voters who live in Democratic areas, and firing professional prosecutors who refuse to participate in something this dishonest." Oh, I could keep going, but it's bad for my blood pressure. THIS is what impeachment is for.
by Ankhorite on November 4th, 2008
Hi, Blob. Re No Child Left Behind, the answer should be simple enough: give schools two grades, one for the progress made by non-disabled kids, and a second grade for the progress the SCHOOL makes bringing medically-disabled kids up to their fullest potential. That way, the disabled kids' scores wouldn't pull down the school's score, and there wouldn't be pressure to dump them. As to the kids who are disabled by poverty or poor parenting instead of a medical condition, I think that the school needs to figure out a way to bring those kids up to speed instead of slowing everyone down. Two hours of recess? Doesn't make sense -- that could be two more hours of teaching / tutoring time. The standards the kids have to meet at the other guy's school are the same standards your third-grader has to meet, so slowing everyone down makes no sense at all. :(
by Ankhorite on November 4th, 2008
Kids suffocate in classrooms, though. Two hours of recess wouldn't go astray.
by Halskiisaklink on November 4th, 2008