ANSWERS: 96
-
The Beatles. The lyrics and meaning in the songs are much better. I've never been much of a stones fan though anyway.
-
The beatles...I love their music!! Especially Penny Lane..In which I named my cell phone after
-
For me, always, always the Stones
-
The Beatles for me.
-
The Beatles! definitely
-
The Beatles. All the way.
-
The Stones. The Beatles are good but SO overrated.
-
Stones, they have a better style of music!
-
Late Beatles Stuff, but for longevity you have to give the Stones the ticket about 8 years as against nearly 50 Hmmmmmmmm Still like the Beatles late stuff though
-
the stones to me are way better.
-
The Beatles
-
Well, The Beateles were a great band. On that note, so were The Stones. Some of the earlier Beatles work was to simple for me, but they evolved musicly so many times that it was a great band. Yoko Ono messed up things though. The Beatles wrote some amazing songs, and were an inspiration to millions. The Ramones got their name from a stage name used by Paul. They were influenced by The Beatles, obviously. The Stones are still a great band, and they were influential as well. They continue to be. The earlier Stones work was simpler than their later work as well, but they didn't experiment as much as The Beatles did. It is hard to pick, sice I like the song Sympathy For The Devil so much. It is sad what happened durring their concert with the fan that died durring that song, concerning the fan that was killed by the Hell's Angel. They won't play Sympathy For The Devil in concert anymore. The Beatles were a better band I would have to say, because they were more well rounded in their musical style over the years. They could have done so much more had they remained a cohesive band. I don't lie Oko Ono's voice, by the way. It sounds like a dying cat. If you know her, please tell her to shut up, and stop trying to sing. I was punished as a child, by her voice. It still makes me want to claw out my eyes.
-
Definately not Yoko Ono! Evil woman sing like a dying cat, EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! Ow, my ears are ringing and have been ringing since I was a child. She should be burned alive, but she might make noise!
-
beatles because no matter how old they are they still sound good.
-
The Rolling Stones.
-
The Beatles music has lasted through decades and the 1965 music through the end stands the test of time. Yes, the Stones have lasted longer. However, during the second half of the 18th Century, Joseph Haydn composed a heck of a lot more pieces of music than Wolfgang Mozart, but Mozart was clearly the better composer. In addition, more Twinkies are consumed each year than my Grandmother's apple pie, but I'll gladly have her pie over a Twinkie any day of the week. I only use this example to let you know it's all about taste as well!
-
The Stones by miles!! Beatles are one of the most overrated bands EVER in my opinion!
-
Both, although I prefer the Beatles by and large it is impossible to rank artists. It depends on my mood. Sometimes I need a little Eleanor Rigby, sometimes a little Sympathy for The Devil ;)
-
man thats tough, both great groups, and with their own type of music.. I would think it would be a TIE between the two.
-
The musicians in the Stones are very talented. I would say i prefer them.
-
I would say the Beatles. They had a vast collection of songs that touched upon many genres. The Stones have staying power but their music is kind of consistent throughout.
-
Beatles....100%.
-
I like them both. Those two are both so good, you can't compare them.
-
I always answered "The Velvet Underground" to this question, since I was sixteen.
-
rolling stones
-
beatles. fo' sho'!
-
The Beatles, I grew up listening to them.....
-
Cradle ^^ Okay okay, I'll answer the question.. think I'll pick Beatles. But neither is something I listen to
-
Stones but I don't really listen to either that much.
-
Beattles and stones are good but I like Zeppelin more than both of them
-
Beatles
-
Tough, but my final answer is the Beatles.
-
"The Beatles"
-
The Stones!
-
The Beatles!
-
The Rolling Stones!
-
The Beatles!
-
The Rolling Stones
-
The Beatles were far more talented. They even wrote songs for the Stones.
-
HELLO John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr, plus all the other groups those four have been apart of
-
The Beatles!
-
The Stones.
-
Beatles
-
The Beatles.
-
Could you please check to see if these are duplicates before you submit them. You are making one duplicate after another. Duplicates are not allowed here. They will just be combined with the original question.
-
Stones fer me! Not to mention dad's in the band! LOL
-
I'm sure I am in the minority here but neither would make my top 20 bands. If I have to pick between the two I'd take The Rolling Stones. I love the Tattoo Me album, but it's the only one I love. I always thought the Beatles were mediocre, just a product of good timing and good publicity.
-
Stones by a slight margin. To put it simply for me, the Stones are probably the best rock band of all time and the Beatles probably the best pop band.
-
Rolling Stones, never liked the beatles
-
Rolling Stones! Real rockers compared to the clean cut Beatles. Always thought the Beatles were slightly overrated.
-
am a fan of both but if i was pushed to choose it would have to be the beatles.
-
I like both but it's hard to compare any band to the Beatles.
-
Rolling Stones.
-
The Beatles
-
Rolling Stones. I've never been real fond of the Beatles. Dunno why.
-
Beatles
-
the stones
-
OOOh, come on...don't make me pick....ok I guess i'll have to say the Stones.
-
Beatles since I like most of their songs and music while I only like a couple of the Rolling Stones' songs. The Beatles are my favorite band of all time.
-
The Rolling Stones. No question.
-
Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles, Beatles.
-
I am not being bias. The Rolling Stones is good but The Beatles is better. They have my vote.
-
The Beatles
-
Beatles, by far.
-
Stones
-
Beatles
-
Beatles by a large amount
-
beatles, no question.
-
It's not a question of "who wrote more songs", which obviously the Beatles would win anyway. But truly comparing them in ability of music, the Beatles win by far.
-
THE BEATLES!
-
Beatles
-
I love them both, but I can always be in a happy Beatles mood whereas I have to be in the mood for the Stones.
-
STONES!
-
The beatles.
-
I do like the Stones beat... But what can I say The Beatles has it all.
-
Beatles
-
Beatles for me:)
-
Rolling Stones...
-
The Beatles.
-
The beatles :D
-
Beatles, all the way!! :)
-
The stones,at least they stayed together.
-
Ruby Tuesday vs Elenor Rigby.Both great bands.The Beatles but only coz they had more songwriting depth and more than one singer = more variety.
-
Do I have to choose? Love them both for different reasons. Can you imagine Mick Jager making it through "American Idol"?
-
ehhh...I guess the fab four...although I think people have been blowin their nuts for waaay too long.
-
Beatles, The Rolling Stones Were grossly over rated.
-
Neither.
-
I prefer the Stones, but gotta give love to the Beatle too, although I can't remember the last time I listened to a Beatles song.
-
I love both, but I think I like the Beatles best.
-
THE BEETLES ALL THE WAY!!! Come oooonnnn.... What kind of question is that!! LOL
-
The Beatles. Did you know they wrote some songs for the Stones?
-
Beetles +6
-
Rolling Stones
-
Beatles
-
Beatles, hands down.
-
The Beatles!!!!!!!!!!
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC