ANSWERS: 53
  • No, I am very sceptical on this sort of thing.. I would have to witness it to believe it.
  • Yes. I'm not sure what it is, but there have been too many encounters throughout history and in various parts of the world for it to be just a myth.
  • No way who does!!!
  • Sure. And I believe in the Boogy-man as well...
  • Yes... this picture tells me... yes... http://hamous.org/images/bigfoot.jpg
  • Yes.. There is foot prints and evidance that he is roaming the planet
  • No, same reason I don't believe in UFO's, ghosts, goblins, witches, vampires, gods, Nessie, etc. Of all the proposed evidence of all these things, all pictures, videos, stories, reports, etc. The bigfoot theory is still just a theory because for some weird reason every piece of supposed evidence turned out to be a hoax or unclear. I guess it was in the 80's when most photos and videos started circulating....in a time when video cameras were just catching on and apparently nobody knew how to hold one still or use the focus features, stuff like that. And now in 2006 when everybody and their brother carries a portable phone with a video camera conveniently installed into it with infinitely better digital quality...now we have no pictures and video. Pretty convenient. :-)
  • As far as that famous clip of the big foot walking in the mountains goes, NO! It looks like a lanky guy walking in a gorilla suit. The gait is very human, not that I know what a bigfoot gait looks like mind you. I just don't buy it. Besides, didn't the guy come forward and admit that he was the one in the suit?
  • i do believe so
  • I dont, simply because I dont think it would be possible for a group of creatures to remain hidden for so long. Remains, or concrete evidence of one has never been found. There might be strange creatures out in your woods, but I think you would notice a 10 foot man a little more. I think that most of the evidence is a hoax.
  • Yes I do.There is forests in the world so dense and mountains so treturous to climb that it is very possible that these creatures have not been sighted very often.Every year new species of animals and plants have been found.To think that we have located all creatures is foolish.I large portion of the world as never been seen,and can't be seen from the sky.Even today spotting wild gorillas in Africa is unusual.they hide well.Why cannot the bigfoot or yeti hide as well or better. Just because the media tries to make a joke of it,they have no facts to disprove bigfoot.I have been a journalist and to give an opinion,even if it is popular,and no real facts to back my story is not news.
  • No because the people who first filmed "bigfoot" admitted that it was his friend in a costume.
  • I have seen so many programs and pictures of him, I do believe he is real, just not sure what he is
  • Believe in bigfoot! i have a bigfoot in fact two so i dont believe i bloody know ive got big feet you dont have to rub it in! lol - no i dont but i belive there has been a form of monster in loch ness formly known as the LOCH NESS MONSTER!! arrgghh!!
  • The Patterson film has been analyzed by expert physiologist. The gait, posture, nature of how it turned its head and the muscle movement under the skin were all analyzed. The conclusion was that it would be impossible for a human to replicate those things so accuratly. Skeptics exist to be just what they are called....skeptics. they are not here to look at all the facts including the ones that validate the matter, they are only interested in the facts that invalidate the matter. The same goes for ufo skeptics and skeptics of any other subject matter that threatens to change our conditioned perception of reality.
  • no, I think there would have to be large communities of such an animal for it to survive, and by now, these would have been discovered. If we could find the gorilla in the 1800s in the isolated area of AFrica it lives in, and we know that there are many orangutan in the Indonesian forests, despite the fact that they are solitary animals, then why have we not found one dead one, one skelelton. All we have are dubious footage and suspicious tracks.
  • There has been evidence supporting that Big Foot exists. However, a lot of this evidence has been disproved. There is one particular story that I find fascinating. It was about a man who's family lived near a family of Big Foots. The Big Foot family was civilized, and could talk. They were all good friends, the Big Foots came to borrow sugar (SERIOUSLY), yada, yada, yada. The way the man told the story was actually very believable. There has been evidence for this story, and some against it. I think it's rubbish. There are more hoaxes than legitimate events. My point is, there are MANY things we are unsure of, and a LOT of ridiculous things, but I still believe in Big Foot. There is just too much evidence that no one can disprove. It seems like a VERY feasible idea. It's just a rare kind of ape or something that hasn't been fully documented yet. People thought the Giant Squid was bogus too.
  • LOL XD Well i do bcuz i've seen a real life guy that has a huge massive foot and so i think its true
  • of course. bigfoot is real. though we believe that we have the world, nay the universe figured out, there are millions of things that man has not and may never discover. so, there....
  • I am not sure because I have never gone deep enough in my WA woods to see or smell one... I BELIEVE these local woods are vast enough & that the Mountains unexplored that a troop of 'creatures' could SURVIVE out there without meeting too many humans... I guess we shall see eventually...
  • Nobody on earth could have a foot that big.
  • You know what they say about mysterious, hairy, man-like creatures with very big feet, don't you....? ;-) Currently available evidence suggests no, there isn't one. All 'evidence' for it has proven to be faked or very ambiguous. Doesn't mean it is an impossibility - but the likelihood is pretty low I'd say.
  • BIGFOOT exists. and he's the Coolest Guy Eva!!! If this is Joe M., give me points. Big foot is real, its in grand theft auto so HA. lol i do blieve in bigfoot though
  • Since there has never been any remains found I can't say for a fact that it does exist, but I can't say that it doesn't exist either because I have no evidence saying that it does't either.
  • I used to, but my scientific skepticism has kicked in. If they're out there, we would've found them by now.I know ghosts exist, but nessie,bigfoot, ufo's, Atlantis and the Bermuda triangle is all a bunch of hooey!
  • i believe in bigfoot because i think he does exist, because there are more updates from around the globe that keep occuring about bigfoot. i always thought that bigfoot is a humanoid gorilla creature or an offshoot of the gorilla species, & also i have been reading some websites that bigfoot has a sagital crest, i know that gorillas have sagittal crests, if gorillas have them, then bigfoot must be an unknown undiscovered gorilla species
  • yes... my feet are huge
  • Yes, there is quite a bit of physical evidence. Tracks, hairs, scat, and tree damage are all "physical evidence." People tend to misuse this phrase when they really mean "physical remains." For an updated overview of the scope of evidence, please refer to the Wikipedia article about bigfoot evidence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_regarding_Bigfoot Evidence vs. Remains The assertion that there is absolutely no physical evidence is absolutely false. There is more physical evidence than most people realize. Physical evidence is found every month in various areas across the country. Distinct tracks that do not match other animal tracks, hairs that match each other but no known wild animals, and large scats that could not be made by any known species, are all "physical evidence." Why haven't we found the remains of a bigfoot that died of natural causes? The short answer: Because "we" have never looked for these kinds of remains. Nobody Looks for Bigfoot Remains No serious work has ever been done to look for remains of surviving wood apes in areas where they are rumored to reside. No one should expect remains of such an elusive species to be found, collected and identified without some effort. Very few remains of ancient wood apes have ever been found in Asia, where they were much more abundant. Millions of gigantos (a branch of the wood ape line) lived and died in Asia over the ages. All the remaining physical evidence we have of them could fit into a few shoe boxes. Fossils of any land animal are very rare. Remains do not become fossilized very often, but unless that happens, all the remains will, in time, become completely reabsorbed into the ecosystem. There would be remains of animals everywhere if remains were not naturally recycled, including bones and teeth. Fossils or preserved bones of wood apes may exist in the Americas, but they will be exceedingly rare, because these animals are rare to begin with, and only a tiny fraction of that population will die in locations and soils that will preserve bones somehow. Odds are slim at best that any bones (which are normally fragmentary) will be found, collected and identified unless a focused effort is made to look for them. Until efforts are made in many places, over a long period of time, no one should be scratching their head wondering why "we" don't have any physical remains. taken from www.bfro.net
  • i love my name
  • honestly though, even though i typed that huge thing before, i am not sure about this. bears are up to 10 feet tall when standing up, but do not look like the creature in the patterson film. if you can watch the video zoomed, notice the muscles moving in the thighs especially. there are also breasts on the creature, making it a female thing.
  • I used to... I suppose anything is possible!!
  • Hey come on!! No fair! I had enough of those comments at school. Just because I'm size 14.... :-(
  • I have to - I wear size 12. :o) Oh, you mean THE "Bigfoot" - no, not really. lol
  • Yeah, I call him 'son' and I'm gettin' a little sick of buyin' new sneakers every three months yo...
  • Honestly? I would have to say yes, and I mean the REAL bigfoot...not just my size-13 shoe boyfriend either.
  • Yes, I do. There have been thousands of sightings reported over the last 100 years. If only one of them is correct, then it proves there is a ellusive creature out there called Bigfoot.
  • i hope so i want to know where he gets his shoes! hey quick question im 12 years old and where 16's any possible records broken? just asking
  • Yes,i'ts possible.
  • Yes I do! Sometimes Bigfoot comes to visit me. To be honest though, I'm not very keen on these visits from my mother in-law. It scares the neighbours.
  • With all the new mammals,insects,and fish found by scientists each year there is very likely a Bigfoot or Yeti.
  • Yes, If you see'em let me know ,he owes me a life time of child support.
  • I want to believe. I saw the photo and video of the bigfoot running into the woods. the way his shoulders moved was dramatic they said. knowing the truth would boost the evolution craze and cast doubt on the garden of eden culture. and human culture as we know it.
  • Yeah it is possible. Could be some type of mutation of somesort that accured in the body during birth and then went crazy as the child grew up. I mean what do you think happened to the elephant man? I mean that was pretty strange. It could be that the hair follicles were different from the rest of the humans so it grew out of control and thus brought forth a stranger known as Big Foot. May be there was too much protein? You know due to the fact that hair is the outgrowth of protein in a humans body.
  • check out this link and judge for yourself, but I'm inclined to believe. http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/15/bigfoot.body/index.html
  • I guess anything is possible.
  • Yes, it's very possible that bigfoot might be real. But until one is caught live, we'll really never know.
  • Yes, I wear a size 12, and have friends that wear up to a size 15. This is a different question than asking if someone believes in "Bigfoot," which to me is a complete hoax.
  • no such critter..they have looked for this thing for way tooo long.no evidence..no animal.lack of credible evidence is proof of non-existance.except for GOD,i dont mess w/him.
  • no but my brother does. i dont believe in him because unless they show me significant proof he exists, like his captured body or something im not going to believe it.
  • The jury is still out, but I'm leaning toward non-belief. There's simply not enough evidence.
  • Well, we wrote off the existence of bonobos as the activity of juvenile chimpanzees until the mid 50s, so really the idea that there are populations of elusive apes we have yet to discover in densely forested areas or treacherous mountain terrain doesn't seem too far-fetched to me. Maybe not likely, but I certainly wouldn't write it off either.
  • I believe it could, b/c God created dinosaurs, why couldn't He have created Bigfoots
  • not really since ive never seen him

Copyright 2017, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy