- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Sure I believe in God, why else would anything exist?
I definitely believe in God.
Yes I do. I believe He is my savior, shepherd, and friend.
Yes, I do, but I am aware, that there are many concepts of God, so I will say, that I believe in the God, that the bible speaks of.
Yes. But I may not have the same concept of God as another person does. A person's relationship with God is a very personal thing.
Yes I do believe in God.
Yes, I sure do. God is an awesome being. God is love.
I have this concept in my head of what an eternal, divine force might do with all of time and an infinite number of universes to play with, if that is what you mean, YES.
No, I don't.
But isn't wonderful that we can be here side by side, each being respectful of the other and his or her beliefs?
Aye.. indeed, but little faith in "Humanity".
Sometimes science gets in the way but yes I do want to believe.
YES.
Yes. As long as it's battered and fried and served up with a pile of fresh, hot chips, lemon wedges and malt vinegar.
Yes I believe in God although sometimes it is hard to continue having faith.
Noooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Yes.
I believe in God. I do not believe in organized religion. I have yet to see any religion not exploit the Bible to fit their own agenda. I believe the Bible to be a help guide not a law or rule book. Stories written that can relate to our troubled lives that can help us see the good and bad which can happen through the choices we make. I believe the word of God that is referred to in the Bible is not the Bible but rather the true word of God is written in our hearts. I believe sin to be anything a person does that they feel the need to hide or make an excuse for their actions. Which may or may not be the same for everyone. I believe God will judge each soul not the souls of an entire religion.
While I believe in the existance of Cod, I do not care for it myself.
Yes, I do. I believe God is different from how various religions portray Him, but yes, I believe there is a God.
Yes I do believe in God. I don't always go to church but i consider myself a christian. I think alot of people go to church for show. I'm not judging anyone, I just meant God knows my heart, and thats all that matters.
Although I do not bind my self to a religion, yes I do believe in Goddess and God.

The universe, and the human brain did not simply happen.
I believe that some entity is responsible.
Organized religion is a subject far removed (except perhaps for Buddism, about which I still know little).
My God has a capitol "G " and yes, I believe.
I've never heard a convincing argument for it.
after thinking it over yes- and I can't explain- theres just nothing better to believe in
Im Catholic and yes I do.
Yes, I do. I commune with her every night.
Yes.
Christian.
Growing up I was mostly exposed to Haddock, and because of this I wasn't all that aware of the other choices that were out there. To me Haddock was the only real choice, the others just didn't seem to have the same integrity, the same substance.
.
Then I met a guy from Newfoundland, where Cod is very popular. And although I was skeptical about it at first, I gradually came to learn more about it. I am still not sure if I believe in it completely, but I am willing to accept the possibility of it.
Cod is good, cod is great give me some cod upon my plate.
I sure am not...I could never let myself believe in something so far fetched. I don't believe in God, I don't believe in spirits of trees and water etc... I don't believe in Alah, I don't believe in unicorns or any of that stuff, it just makes no sense. They are all just outdated superstitious believes formed thousands of years ago.
Nope.
Yes I do.
Yes.
YES
Honestly I'm not gunna lie i do not believe in god.. because i do not believe one person created the world.. i believe many things.. and also if there was a god wouldn't he have come to Earth by now???
Yes, I do believe in God.
yes
Yes, everything needs a designer and a builder.
Yes. God helps me with every thing in life and God helps everyone else in life also.
Some people dont believe God exists and well i respect that if they have a different religion or no religion at all but I believe in God and i believe he has and will always be there for me.
So, Yes.
Yes, ardently.
Yes he does, read the bible it is there for a reason. It is him reaching out to you. The bible are all of God's thoughts. There you will find your answer, and for what the future of this world holds.
And as the saying goes "God works in mysterious ways" You never know that when a stranger comes to assist you it could be God? That a homeless person came knocking on your door asking for food? These things, God could be using it to test you on how much good is in your heart.
I believe in the God of the Bible. The creator of the heavens and the earth.
Christianity personifies God as if he were sort of a spiritual "superperson". Not acceptable for me. I been looking at Buddism a bit.
absolutely a fine white fish
Yes, a very lovely fish.
The Abrahamic God? The one who killed millions of people? No. Spinoza's concept of God? Maybe. Personally I've always thought it was me.
No
No. I will not say there is not a god but I do not believe there is one. I am agnostic.
nope. I've studied several religions, and even more of the sciences, and I just cannot bring myself to think there is a 'god'. The whole concept just seems absurd to me.
Is the rest of the Universe this Stupid????
by God on January 27th, 2012
| 2 people like this
If God is love why do some of His 'true believers' hate? Are they just pretending they believe because it is hate that motivates?
by RosieGHM Jetpacker on January 26th, 2012
| 2 people like this
Why did God create YOU?
by anil m on February 2nd, 2012
| 1 person likes this
If God is merciful and forgives us of our sins, then what incentive is there for us to resist sin, so long as we repent afterwards?
by mumpsimus on January 24th, 2012
| 6 people like this
Why do people believe that if God exists, then he has to be good instead of evil? Or why can't be be both? Or maybe Satan is the good one?
by msminnamouse on January 23rd, 2012
| 3 people like this
You're reading I believe in a God, do you?
- which can also be phrased in the following ways:
Comments
Yeh.His name is PELE.
I bet ya didn't know that the best god,the top god,numero uno god,was/is a football player.
See,it's true,ya can learn summink new every day.
by WITTY 1 on May 25th, 2007
Actually, before the immortal Pele was born (I agree with you about his athletic skills), Pele was the name of the Hawaiian volcano goddess. :)
by Ankhorite on December 30th, 2007
Physics?
by 23Skidoo on June 7th, 2008
What about them?
by yup. on June 8th, 2008
Everything else would exist because of science. Big bang theory, evolution, and many other scientific theories have plenty of hard evidence that show they exist, unlike god, which has 0 evidence. The only reason you believe in god is because millions of other people do. It's like people who thought the earth was flat or thought the sun and other planets revolved around the earth; just because a lot of people believe it, doesn't mean it's true.
by mikedb05 on June 9th, 2008
No, I don't give a fuck as to what other people think. If everything else exists because of science, then why does science exist?
by yup. on June 9th, 2008
the big bang made EVERYTHING in the universe
by Brawl on July 20th, 2008
Science exists in order to advance mankind and improve our lives, plus it does tend to find out the truth as well.
by Retrovampire on August 14th, 2008
So you're saying science exists because of mankind... not the other way around.
by yup. on August 18th, 2008
Depends, scientific pursuit exists because of mankind. The findings of science exist regardless.
Are you talking of natural science? This is the study of the natural world, the natural world still would exist regardless.
So yes the practice exists because of mankind, the findings exist regardless.
by Retrovampire on August 18th, 2008
So then tell me; how could there be "findings" without mankind there to find them?
by yup. on August 19th, 2008
"the findings exist regardless", the observed exists regardless, the earth exists regardless.
The practice of looking at the earth exists because of mankind, the earth exists regardless.
by Retrovampire on August 19th, 2008
"Findings" are of a physical nature regardless whether they are found or not.
The practice of finding something exists because of mankind, but what they find exists regardless.
by Retrovampire on August 19th, 2008
So if it doesn't come from mankind, where does it come from?
by yup. on August 19th, 2008
If what doesnt come from mankind?
by Retrovampire on August 19th, 2008
Well, let me just ask it this way: why do you think there is existence?
by yup. on August 21st, 2008
Are you talking about what coursed existence or the reason for existence?
As for a course for ultimate existence of anything & everything...no idea. The pre-big bang, big bang etc and what came before it, we will probably never know.
As for a reason, well answering the first course will answer this. Or you could say there is no reason, does there need to be?
by Retrovampire on August 22nd, 2008
Too bad I can only give you a -1 for that answer
by Mephistopheles on September 12th, 2008
Down rating someones answer just because of their religious beliefs is not the atheist way. We may be expected to end up in hell but lets not fulfill all their expectations of us.
by Retrovampire on September 12th, 2008
Sorry I didn't catch that comment before, Retro. Anyway, I was referring to what you think coursed existence. I definitely don't think there has to be a reason for existence, but it just seems illogical to me to think that some form of intelligence had nothing to do with the creation of the universe and everything in it.
by yup. on September 12th, 2008
Here is possibly the biggest area of logical disagreement between believers and nonbelievers, as I can not see why a deity of any kind would in any way be involved. I see no reason why any of this should or should not require a god cause. If you laid out all the possible answers for our existence, even those beyond our understanding, then that alone shows up one answer of a god and millions of answers not involving a god. Many of the alternate answers are much more believable than a magical super being, and far more logical regardless of how difficult or mind bending they are to understand.
by Retrovampire on September 13th, 2008
So, share them with me.
by yup. on September 14th, 2008
Yea.. share them because I disagree and will bet your "millions of answers" is bull. No one has to believe but just because you do not believe does not mean you have to use fiction in your debate.
by Snooch on September 14th, 2008
If you expect me to try and explain other people’s theories, forget it. You can read them for yourself, there are many on answerbag alone not to mention the many thousands on the internet. What do you want? Scientific theory? The big bang? Steady state? Ekpyrotic universe? Colliding universe? Dark matter? None of these explain the origin of the universe or existence. The origin is before all of this, before creation as you would put it. The closest science has come has been Penrose-Hawking Singularity Theorems, but its not proven. Don’t look to test me on this in order to dismantle my theories because I have none.
I have heard hundreds of scientific, philosophical, religious, superstitious, flight of fancy, science fictional, poetic, pathetic and just plain ridicules explanations for the beginning of all things…
by Retrovampire on September 15th, 2008
…There are millions. And not “mine”, as “smooch” seems to suggest. Fiction, of course! Only one can be true, if any at all, so all the others would have to be fiction. I have no idea which one may be correct (if any), but I can certainly sift out a lot of the illogical ones.
For me (and this would be of no surprise to you) that would be anything that involves magic, of any kind. For this reason alone all the god related theories (and there are a lot of them too) go straight out the window. I don’t believe a god started everything off, and I don’t believe saying a god started everything answers anything.
by Retrovampire on September 15th, 2008
It's "Snooch" and you lost me in all your dribble.
Have a great day Revo
by Snooch on September 15th, 2008
Dribble? It’s called plain English.
Anyway...Sweet Charity.: I do not mean to sound demeaning to religions, after the "big-bang" both science and religion have many theories, one based on physical, cosmological and mathematical science and the other based upon a book or books. I happen to side with the science, but so what! The big question is what came before everything else..science and religion can not answer this, but have theories. The problem with the religious theories though is that God always existed first, yet we are speaking of pre-existence, before God.
by Retrovampire on September 15th, 2008
All that above, is dribble to me. Whatever though, you can side with whoever you want. What you eat, doesn't make me fat.
Have a good one.
by Snooch on September 15th, 2008
"What you eat, doesn't make me fat", this suggests you believe what you do because it makes you feel good? Fulfilled? It takes a bit more for me to believe something.
by Retrovampire on September 16th, 2008
It seems to me, the simple notion of "pre-existence" is damn near impossible for any human to understand, and maybe that's the way God wanted it. Can you imagine a time when there wasn't time? Hell, I can't even make sense out of that question.
Still, though, if you admittedly have no idea as to the course of existence, then why completely rule out the idea of a deity that exists or once existed?
by yup. on September 16th, 2008
In simple terms, it means believe what you want, it does not have any bearing on me. Vice/versa. It is that simple.
Hope that clarified it for you.
I am not religious, I am of faith. Faith in God and only God. You cannot disprove God anymore than you say we cannot prove Him. We have reached an empasse.
by Snooch on September 16th, 2008
I agree...on the surface the idea of an existence seems quite simple...only after scratching away at the surface it then becomes a major headache. I admit the idea of a deity of some kind is a possibility...but I give it no more credit than I would of any other magical being.
by Retrovampire on September 16th, 2008
Now let’s just say way, way in the future mankind discovers some kind of life force, an energy, a vapour of kinds that existed at the beginning of time. What do you think we would make of that? Now religion would instantly say its God, or at the very least the holy spirit (they will probably fall out over that one), some atheists may even convert. But I would not even start to think any of that, another life form is just another life form, certainly not something to be worshiped.
by Retrovampire on September 16th, 2008
Well then, we're on similar pages. I just think there actually was some sort of life force at the beginning of time that created everything, because I've yet to hear something that makes more sense. That's how I define "God." I'm not referring to any religious views or anything like that; I'm agnostic.
by yup. on September 18th, 2008
I had a similar view for many years and counted myself as agnostic. For a long time I never thought about it much, but over the last couple of years I come to realise that atheist fits my way of thinking much better.
Maybe if you dropped the god title it would make even more sense? A life form is only a life form, what ever that form maybe, even if as yet it is beyond our imagination, even if it is responsible for our creation...its just another form of life. Why tag it with such a crudely absurd name as a god?
by Retrovampire on September 19th, 2008
your question doesn't make sense.
by annie03 on July 23rd, 2009
Sorry annie03...who`s question? Sweet Charity`s?
by Retrovampire on July 23rd, 2009
yes, Sweet Charity's original question. Thanks for clarifying that.
by annie03 on July 24th, 2009
I suppose the definition of "god" must come into play on this one. It seems to me that a being of either greater or lesser intelligence has created us, or we were a complete accident. I define "god" as that being of greater intelligence.
by yup. on July 28th, 2009
I would say that I’m not too happy with the word "accident" as to how life began. Life was an inevitability of its environment; it pretty much had no choice.
It’s kind of how water is an inevitable consequence of Oxygen and Hydrogen in certain environments.
by Retrovampire on July 28th, 2009
While I can understand Sweet Charity's desire for a heroic and romantic explanation, I have to agree with Retrovampire. Science can explain the mysteries of life. Art can show us the beauty and mystique of it. Revel in your relationships with fellow humans instead of pondering and worshiping imagined authority.
by annie03 on July 28th, 2009
When did I insinuate that I had a desire for a "heroic and romantic" explanation? Hell, I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.
Actually, let me back up one more time. My initial response was, obviously, "...why else would anything exist?" So, really, I'm not talking about the existence of life, I'm talking about existence itself. Why would anything exist without something there to create it?
by yup. on July 29th, 2009
So why would that "something" "God" "Being" "What ever" exist before "we" existed? Your logic cancels itself out.
If "existence" requires a god to create it, then how does a god come to exist? Its completely circular and just doesn’t work.
by Retrovampire on July 29th, 2009
I didn't mean to offend you sweet charity. It just seems like the desire for an explanation leads to "beliefs" that just, in my opinion, are fantasies. Like believing in Superman, or Santa Claus.
by annie03 on July 29th, 2009
Why would god exist, if he has no creator?
by Tahuti on November 15th, 2009
You have a good point. Religious people say that the universe didn't pop out of nowhere, yet god did.
??????????
by Brawl on November 15th, 2009
Something had to have always existed, everyone knows that. That which always existed must have had all of the universe's mass and energy, and later created the universe. That leaves three options:
.
1. God always existed
2. Some inanimate infintesimal spec always existed
3. The entire universe as it is now always existed
.
And very few people believe in the third option. So God didn't "pop out of nowhere" he just existed, as something must have.
by POP Fan on November 20th, 2009
What about the universe always existing in other forms as the one we have today, no one knows what happened before the big bang or if this is even the only universe, maybe there are endless universes going through processes like the big bang all the time, either way, there are no evidence of god but lots for the universe.
by Tahuti on November 21st, 2009
Obviously there's evidence for the universe, if the universe didn't exists how would we?
by POP Fan on November 21st, 2009
Its a common miss-conception that when discussing the "Big Bank" theory people think that before the big bang nothing at all existed, like even the darkness didn’t exist, not even the void of space, which is why many struggle to get their head fully around the subject. The big bang theory is based upon the concept that the universe medium, ie: the apparent nothingness of space, has always existed. The Universe as we know it today exploded into that void, and as “Tahuti” has said, it may well have done this billions of times, taking billions of years to grow and then collapse....each time being different but the medium always existing.
Even when using the big bang theory, the void medium always existed. So it’s not like the universe actually came from nowhere.
by Retrovampire on November 21st, 2009
So you see the "three options" as stated are in fact wrong.
3rd option is in fact the old steady state theory, which was ditched as wrong some years back.
2nd option is supposed to be the big bank theory, but "POP Fan`s" interpretation of it is wrong.
1st option forgets to mention the million and one other "Being’s” that could be used in the place of the word god. ie: The Force, Thor, Pixies, fairies...what ever, the list could be endless.
by Retrovampire on November 21st, 2009
God refers to any creator.
.
I know that the universe didn't spring from nothing, but the only thing that was first existant in the big bang theory was the particles that later made planets. Unlike some Christians can be, I've researched the subject before saying anything. The scientific comunity says that, moving closer to the point where the big bang occured (meaning earlier in time), mass and energy became one. This means that, before the big bang, we had simply a void and a small area containing all the mass and energy of the universe.
by POP Fan on November 21st, 2009
So that means, either this mass and energy always existed, or God existed and created that mass and energy (assuming the big bang theory is foolproof). So the second option isn't interpreted wrong, just not explained fully.
by POP Fan on November 21st, 2009
Although technically planets were created by suns,(splitting hairs I know) your description is generally rather good.
And you would be correct in your reasoning that if the mass/energy always existed then a god/creator may also have existed. The thing to remember here though is that when faced with a physical existance/reality that the always existing mass/energy would not require a god/creator, and a always existing mass/energy is far more rational/logical than an always existing god/creator.
by Retrovampire on November 22nd, 2009
I`m not sure if I`m being very clear here, I`m sorry.
To keep it simple would be to say:
A steady state mass/energy is a physically simplistic phenomena, where as a steady state god/creator is an unjustifiably overly complicated phenomena.
by Retrovampire on November 22nd, 2009
Or another way:
One requires physics.
The other requires magic.
by Retrovampire on November 22nd, 2009
I've had this conversation before, and I do realize that, scientifically speaking, God is an improbability, but he is undeniably a possibility.
.
God would not require "magic" per se. There's plenty we don't know yet, we haven't even explored the oceans anywhere near fully. I understand the likelihood is low, but I think we still don't know enough to say exactly how low.
by POP Fan on November 23rd, 2009
Also, on the subject of not knowing a lot, it is possible that people have telekenetic powers but that part of the brain is hidden, locked or underdeveloped.
by Brawl on November 23rd, 2009
Fair does, magic is possibly the wrong word and may well be linked more with a Christian god and not gods in general.
And yes the possibility is still there, but there are so many other possibilities likely before considering gods, that to be honest gods are not really on the scale.
But you are most certainly right, we know very little really...but it would be foolish to start jumping to extremes when much more rational answers would be the logical starting point in exploring our own existence.
by Retrovampire on November 24th, 2009
Rule of thumb: When faced with options as to answering a question more often than not the most mundane answer is the correct one. And although the correct answer may well be satisfying scientifically its rarely satisfying emotionally.
by Retrovampire on November 24th, 2009
Can we end this infinite argument or continue it elsewhere? Cos' this is spamming me.
by Brawl on November 24th, 2009
Why would this conversation be spamming you? If you mean you constantly get emails informing you of new comments, then simply change your Answerbag settings.
by Retrovampire on November 24th, 2009
I'm glad we reached a conclusion we can agree on :)
by POP Fan on November 24th, 2009
I mean on my "activities" page.
by Brawl on November 24th, 2009
good point yup. if god didnt exist, how could anything else exist?
by SeannaSaurus Rex on November 28th, 2009
Seanna...I think maybe you need to read the other comments??
by Retrovampire on November 28th, 2009
haha i didnt think there were THIS many comments!! Did I just ruin a "conference" of sorts?
by SeannaSaurus Rex on November 28th, 2009
Your presence I’m sure would ruin nothing....
I believe things here was coming to an end!
by Retrovampire on November 28th, 2009