When was moses born?

MOSES

(Mo′ses) [Drawn Out [that is, saved out of water]].

“Man of the true God,” leader of the nation of Israel, mediator of the Law covenant, prophet, judge, commander, historian, and writer. (Ezr 3:2) Moses was born in 1593 B.C.E., in Egypt, being the son of Amram, the grandson of Kohath, and the great-grandson of Levi. His mother Jochebed was Kohath’s sister. Moses was three years younger than his brother Aaron. Miriam their sister was some years older.—Ex 6:16, 18, 20; 2:7.

Most scholars believe Moses was born about 1300 B.C.E.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10596a.htm

With love in Christ.

Scholars vary in their assessment. I go with somewhere in the 13th - 14th century B.C.

April 1, 1969

According to the Bible, it should have been 1391 BC, Actually, we don't even know if he existed. But the personage who is at the source of this story could have been born in a quite broad time range.

"There is considerable uncertainty as to what date the Bible implies for the Exodus taking place. Suggestions are from 1648 to 1208 BCE"

"In the Exodus account, the birth of Moses, on 7 Adar 2368 (about Feb-Mar 1391 BCE), occurred at a time when the current Egyptian Pharaoh had commanded that all male Hebrew children born be killed by drowning in the river Nile."

"This birth legend is in many respects similar to the 7th century BCE Neo-Assyrian version of the birth of the king Sargon of Akkad in the 24th century BCE who, being born of modest means, was set in the Euphrates river in a basket of bulrushes and discovered by a member of the Akkadian royalty who reared him as their own. Professor Eric H. Cline refers to the story of the birth of Moses as a 'foundation myth', similar to those of Sargon, Cyrus the Great and Romulus and Remus."

"Known extra-Biblical references to Moses date from many centuries after his supposed lifetime, and contain significant departures from the Biblical account. In addition to the Judeo-Roman or Judeo-Hellenic historians Artapanus, Eupolemus, Josephus, and Philo, a few gentile historians including Polyhistor, Manetho, Apion, Chaeremon of Alexandria, Tacitus and Porphyry make reference to him. The extent to which any of these accounts rely on earlier sources is unknown. Moses also appears in other religious texts such as the Midrash, Mishnah and Qur'an
No other surviving written records from Egypt, Assyria, etc., indisputably referring to the stories of the Bible or its main characters before ca. 850s BCE have been found, and there is no known physical evidence (such as pottery shards or stone tablets) to corroborate Moses' existence."

"There is also the suggestion that Moses was not a real historical figure and that the Exodus did not occur at all. Some archaeologists have claimed that surveys of ancient settlements in Sinai do not appear to show a great influx of people around the time of the Exodus (given variously as between 1500–1200 BCE), as would be expected from the arrival of Joshua and the Israelites in Canaan. This suggests that the biblical Exodus may not be a literal depiction. Archaeologists such as Israel Finkelstein, Ze'ev Herzog and William G. Dever, regard the Exodus as non-historical, at best containing a small germ of truth. According to Prof. Ze'ev Herzog, Director of the Institute of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University "This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel.... The many Egyptian documents that we have make no mention of the Israelites' presence in Egypt and are also silent about the events of the exodus."
Source and further information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses

Last Thursday

I dunno. Springtime?!
;-)

I hate to say this, but there's a good chance that Moses is purely mythical. The ancient world has stories of other characters that are quite similar to Moses--for example, the Akkadian king Sargon was supposed to have been placed in a basket on the river but rescued by a princess and raised in the palace. He grew up to discover that he was not a Sumerian but a member of a group of people subdued by the Sumerians, so he led a successful revolt.
Too many elements of the story of the Exodus are simply outlandish. The Bible says that the Exodus group contained 600,000 men, which would mean, when we add in women and children, about--what?--2 or 3 million. That's as many people as the entire culture of ancient Egypt had at its height. What would occur of that many of your people--your principle workforce--just up and left one day? Plus, all the newborn boys of your culture have died in the tenth plague, all your crops have been devoured by locusts, and your entire army drowns in the effort to retrieve the runaway slaves. Would Egypt have survived at all? If so, wouldn't the Egyptians, who were great record-keepers, have at least mentioned the episode, or at least mentioned that the Hebrews had lived there for centuries?
If 2 - 3 million people wander around in a relatively small area for forty years, an area that is quite archaeologically rich, wouldn't they have left a trace of being there? A sandal? A spoon? Something?
Some scholars think that maybe something on a very small scale may have occured to one group that had some presence in Egypt that over time their story got retold and expanded over many generations until the full-blown story of the Exodus was adopted by all the Hebrew tribes as their national story. I agree with those Biblical scholars.