- NEW!
by KingLeonidas on October 12th, 2008
haha the french would hate that, they still think its there channel.
by Firebrand on June 21st, 2009
NO NO NO. we have enough boring events now . It could not by its very nature have people watching except on TV and who would want to sit in front of a TV for over 24 hours. to have cameras covering each swimmer it would cost a fortune and make no ticket receipts at all.
by Ed the Jetpacking Headbanger on June 20th, 2009
Yes, sounds like an interesting event.
by Grandma Roses - my avatar is my real dog on October 12th, 2008
Sure, why not? It would be more challenging than just swimming in a pool and Olympians are supposed to be ready to challenge themselves.
by Woody-V6 on October 12th, 2008
Not a good idea...to many Garlic Turds floating around
by Schonberg on October 12th, 2008
As its one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world my answers has to be a definate no.+2
by jangobean on October 12th, 2008
Yes, most definitely. Good question, lets start a campaign.
London is the best city in the world! why/why not?
by DTB3 on August 8th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Will Goliath make a good center in basketbal if he was alive today?
by HoboJoe on October 13th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
why do people always mix up Tower bridge with London bridge?
by DTB3 on August 8th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
is the wo0rld really going to end in 2012?
by pearlandrew on December 21st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Wenlock and Mandeville - who? what? why?
by dea_ex_machina on May 20th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Should the 2012 Olympics have a swimming event across the English Channel?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments