do you think its wrong to post nude or semi nude photos of my wife on the net without telling her

Comments

• You are right again, ... you know what they say about online publishing, "Once it is published, you can't get it back" ... wow, the idea scares me ..

  • Report
  

  by Safe Mode on April 25th, 2011

Comments

• Sorry, legally it's okay if one owns the photos. It is morally wrong though. I wouldn't do that to my wife.

  • Report
  

  by someone0067 on April 15th, 2011

• No, according to the "legal aspects of photography" if anyone other than the photographer and the subject person/persons in the photo see a photo it is considered 'published'. If the person/persons in the photo object and have not given written permission to publish the photo whom ever is responsible for publishing can be sued. Publishing photos such as described by the question on the internet or in a magazine etc. is laying the person wide open to litigation without a signed release to publish the photos.
  -
  Have you ever noticed on news or other type media publications where some people are blurred out in the background? The reason is because those producing the show did not have permission to show their face.

  • Report
  

  by Thinker on April 15th, 2011

• you tell em, thinker!
  amen

  • Report
  

  by human_tripod on July 5th, 2011

• You don't need a "model release" if it's taken in public. Also If you own the photo you can publish it. Period. You can blur it or not. That's why I said that it's morally wrong. The person in the photo could, of course, sue but it would be a civil complaint, not criminal....Geez I can't even believe I'm having this conversation with some $h!t house lawyer.

  • Report
  

  by someone0067 on July 6th, 2011

• if not a violation of the victim's legal fights then how can she sue?
  civil or criminal

  • Report
  

  by human_tripod on July 6th, 2011

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments