by Answerbag Staff on December 9th, 2009

Answerbag Staff

Poll

Help answer this question below.

Should Religious Leaders Be Able to Endorse Political Candidates?

Embed
  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 139 helpful answers below.

  • by Razzle-Fratchit on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Razzle-Fratchit

    Business leaders do. Journalists do. Celebrities do. Newspapers do. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS and STATE UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS do. State contractors and members of the Bar do. Religion is about matters of right and wrong, and when public officials and candidates for public office are championing wicked and evil causes religious leaders are obligated to speak out against them. If they don't, they're not doing their job.

    • Like
    • Report

    6 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by my2cents--Vote for Paul on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    my2cents--Vote for Paul

    Just because a person is a preacher does not mean he/she cannot voice their own opinion about their county. The church cannot sponsor a candidiate but the pastor can. The pastor cannot use the church's money to give to the candidate either.

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by OhLook - IamNoLongerAnonymous on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    OhLook - IamNoLongerAnonymous

    The First Amendment prohibits government from infringing the free exercise of religion and free speech. Restricting a religious organization right to do either of these things is unconstitutional. You cannot pick and choose who the Constitution applies to.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by John Pacella on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    John Pacella

    Why not? They get to vote too.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by pandora on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    pandora

    Why not. Big corporations can and its not like they do it without expecting some kind of reward.
    I think if you are going to do away with endorsements from any one group than you should deny all. But then how will we narrow down who to vote for. Someone has got to fund the campaigns. It would mean more tax dollars are needed. I'm not forking over extra!

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Meezermagic on December 14th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Meezermagic

    Religious people follow the guidance of their church leaders; non religious people are unlikely to take much notice. The Catholic Bishops advise against their people voting for politicians who are Pro Choice, for instance. I think they are right to make a stand for truth as they see it, but I doubt very much that any religious leader's endorsement or lack of it will make a material difference to voting outcomes. The right to express an opinion is one of democracy's fundamental freedoms.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on December 14th, 2009
    voted: No

    Anonymous

    Jesus himself gives us the example for true Christians to follow
    Although Jesus was urged to intervene in political matters or take sides, he refused to do so. He turned down Satan’s offer of power over all the kingdoms of the world, he refused to be drawn into an argument over the paying of taxes, and he withdrew when a popular movement wanted to make him king. (Matthew 4:8-10; 22:17-21; John 6:15) But his neutrality did not prevent him from working for the benefit of others.
    Jesus concentrated on what would bring lasting good to others. While his feeding the five thousand and curing the sick brought temporary relief for a few, his teaching made everlasting blessings available to all mankind. Jesus became known, not as an organizer of relief campaigns, but simply as “the Teacher.” (Matthew 26:18; Mark 5:35; John 11:28) He said: “For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth.”—John 18:37.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Theophilous on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Theophilous

    There are politicians whos stances on moral issues is not just at variance, but is acctually opposed to the moral stance of churches. For example, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry stance on abortion with regard to their position within the Catholic Church. That any organization, can be forbidden from expressing their preference for political office by threat of tax sanction is deplorable. Let Jerimiah Wright endorse Obama, and let the Church of Jesus proclaim his policies to be antithetical to orthodoxy christianity, and as such oppose his candidacy.

    The seperation of church and state should mean that the state cannot interfer with the freedom of the church to speak out against those whos policies they oppose and to endorce those they support. Otherwise it is censorship, and an interference with freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by ryunkin on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    ryunkin

    Religious leaders, like anyone else, is an individual with an opinion and, in the great American tradition of freedom of speech, should be allowed to voice it. It is really up to us to agree with it or not.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Hellaphunt's Skynet on December 21st, 2009
    voted: No

    Hellaphunt's Skynet

    "Religious leaders can endorse candidates as private citizens, but they should not be permitted to use tax-exempt church resources or the pulpit to do so."

    • Like
    • Report

    3 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by donameche on December 21st, 2009
    voted: No

    donameche

    I believe the separation of Church and State are clear. Most people who endorse conservatives values believe otherwise. I remember when they Klu Klux Klan went to churches to beef up there numbers. Such a shame Racism and Religion can't ever sit at the same table.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Tallyman on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Tallyman

    Of course. The US was founded as a Christian nation.

    If you restrict religious leaders form free speech, then you must restrict atheists and agnostics from endorsing Candidates.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by tiredofgettingscrewed on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    tiredofgettingscrewed

    Sure, in the USA it's called free speech.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Tom 47 is back in his bear COAT on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Tom 47 is back in his bear COAT

    Religious leaders or "spokespersons" certainly have no less right to publicly endorse a candidate for public office than any other spokesperson for any tax exempt organization or lobby group (which are legion). Saying they cannot would mean that religious people are second class citizens, but members of PACs are full citizens...with freedom of speech, assembly, lobby, etc.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by ccmyplaymate on December 12th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    ccmyplaymate

    Freedom of speech guarantees the rights of anyone to their point of view. Yes, religious leaders also have this right. However, the state should never endorse religious views. The state is to be separate from religion and the personal lives of the people.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Factotum on December 12th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Factotum

    Any religious leader has the right to free speech. A church does not. The sanction against the church that published the 'don't vote for Clinton' piece was wrong to do so in that it was essentially a paid advertisement for his opposition.

    A preacher, however retains his free speech when he speaks to his congregation. The (uncredited) poll finding that 3/4 of Americans believe it is inappropriate 'for churches to publicly endorse candidates for public office' is irrelevant. What matters is law, not public opinion.

    Indeed people often leave churches that get too political which is the right thing to do.

    Americans United was kind enough to point out that pastors can still talk about certain issues, but the fact of the matter is that they wish to muzzle men of the cloth the way Congress muzzles military personnel.

    The difference is that the military is a wholly owned subsidiary of the United States and individual men of the cloth are not.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by qtfoot on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    qtfoot

    Look at Rev Wright and Al Sharpton. What good could it do? They have no knowledge that makes their endorsement valuable. They are idiots?????

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by JustMyThoughts on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    JustMyThoughts

    They are allowed. We all are allowed. No matter the impact.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by tastiger on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    tastiger

    Everyone should be able to endorse a political candidate, whether religious or celebrity, or whatever.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Just Another on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Just Another

    Of course. They have the same rights as anybody else.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Yeahwell... on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Yeahwell...

    Read the constitution.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Halliburton Shill on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    Halliburton Shill

    Just out of curiosity, was there as much protest over religious leaders supporting Bush-Cheney or is this simply a tea bag reaction to Obama? Either way, my answer/vote is NO, freedom of religion does mean freedom to operate covert political campaigns. If a religion wants to be a political action committee, it should be regulated like a PAC, not a religion.

    • Like
    • Report

    7 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Yeahwell... on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Yeahwell...

    Freedom of speech!

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by FoolishOne on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    FoolishOne

    Of COURSE. It's a free country (so far). Last I checked we had a little thing called freedom of speech here where anyone can voice their opinion, so long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Twisted Taco on February 1st, 2010

    Twisted Taco

    Look at how well that works in places like Iraq, Iran, etc.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by LarryH54 on December 16th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    LarryH54

    It is EVERY citizen's right to endorse whom they choose. Separation of Church and State was originally designed to protect religion from govt, NOT vise-versa. Although not all the Founding Fathers were Christian per se, they were all immersed in a Christian culture, which they assumed to be a necessary prerequisite to our style of govt. Indeed, America's fall has tracked closely with its rejection of God and godly values for decades.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT

    why should tax status have anything to do with the right to free speach? hell, if bussiness men can buy politicians, certainly religious leaders can recomend others.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by the_kid1991 on December 13th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    the_kid1991

    it does not matter who gives money you vote for who you want to win no matter who you are and its your right to give money to the cause you want and tell who ever you want

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by snowberry on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    snowberry

    I think they should, but it's even better if they make sure everyone knows how to search out the candidate who best reflects their views. That's not always so easy.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by The Wraith of God is Coming on December 11th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    The Wraith of God is Coming

    Well I'd say someone who damned America stands on their ideals.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Heather108 on December 10th, 2009
    voted: No

    Heather108

    Religious leaders giving an opinion about politics has an equal value to my opinion about your up-coming brain surgery.

    • Like
    • Report

    8 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by RefreshPerspective on July 22nd, 2010
    voted: No

    RefreshPerspective

    Separation of church and state. No exceptions.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by mrrw on June 12th, 2010
    voted: No

    mrrw

    Churches should be taxed. Then let them blather away.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by DA BEN DAN yanggui zi on January 3rd, 2010
    voted: No

    DA BEN DAN yanggui zi

    NO!!!!

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Life Not Faith on December 22nd, 2009
    voted: No

    Life Not Faith

    If they are allowed to play politics then they should pay taxes as well.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Bull wears a COAT of many colours on December 18th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Bull wears a COAT of many colours

    The aim of the constitution on this point was to keep government from dictating to the people what they could believe. In no way was there an intent to prevent religion from guiding the morals of the country. America has become disgustingly immoral because of the lack of religeous influence on it's leaders.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Maul on December 17th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Maul

    Religious leaders have the same right to free speech as any other American. If they feel called to endorse who they feel best represents their religious faith, they have the right to do so. Just like radio talk show hosts or Celebrities. Dear God the Celebrities. If religious leaders are told to shut their mouth, the Celebrities should go first! They are just bad if not worse and even more arrogant. I think anyone who wants a Religious leader silenced, only wants to do so to eliminate the voice of the political right wing. everyone has the right to endorse a political candidate. EVERYBODY!

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Robertd903 on December 17th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Robertd903

    "Religious leaders" are people too, so why shouldn't they be afforded the right to endorse political candidates--just like anyone else?

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Observer on December 16th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    Observer

    They should be able to endorse people as long as they follow the law like the rest of us have to.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by hong kong phooey on December 16th, 2009
    voted: No

    hong kong phooey

    religion and politics have got nothing to do with each other

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT

    everyone has the right to their political opinion.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on December 15th, 2009
    voted: Yes

    TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT

    everyone can voice their political opinion. that is part of what makes america america. if by endorse you mean say "we like this candidate" then yes they should be able to. if by endorse you mean buy their loyalty the way big bussinesses do then no.... that should be illegal for everyone.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by MasterDebater on December 14th, 2009
    voted: No

    MasterDebater

    Soon after the birth of this nation many leaders beleived in the SEPARATION of the church and state. This quote written by James Madison pretty much explains the best reason for separation, "practical distinction between Religion and Civil Government is essential to the purity of both, and as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States."[

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by leetmeat on December 12th, 2009
    voted: No

    leetmeat

    Assuming that we are talking about in the US, if they are the head of a religious organization that receives tax-exempt status, No. Non-profits, who also cannot endorse political candidates, lose their tax exempt status if they do this, why should religious organizations be any different?

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Djinn on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    Djinn

    Seperate church and state.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by LynfromNM on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    LynfromNM

    I think a political endorsement would disqualify the entity from non-profit standing.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by ChrisDC on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    ChrisDC

    If what were at stake here was the right of religious leaders to endorse candidates, I would be at the forefront of defending them.

    This isn't even about whether organizations can endorse candidates. They can, and do, regularly, frequently, and I'll defend their right to do that whether I agree with them or not.

    This is about one thing -- whether a tax exempt organization (a separate question from whether its officers or leaders can do this) can use its resources to endorse a candidate.

    There are tons of places in the tax code for political organizations, some of which have a clear religious purpose, and that's fine.

    The question is why should contributions made to a religious organization for political purposes be tax deductible, when contributions made to other types of non-profits are not.

    Bear in mind -- the issue here isn't what religious organizations can and cannot do. The issue is what type of organization you can contribute to and deduct that contribution.

    Also -- the question here is "Where should we draw a line between preaching and politicking?" and it is posed as a Yes or No answer. In this new Answerbag format, could you at least keep idiots from writing the questions and setting up the polls? I thought these jokers were supposed to be "experts."

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Talamasca on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    Talamasca

    Personally, I’m sick of all churches whining about everything. Everybody is always picking on me, no one understands, wah wah wah poor me.
    The only reason they gripe is because it doesn’t fit their personal agenda. Whether they’re a Christian, Muslim or Jew, they’re the only ones with the moral turpitude to determine what is best for society, be it Christian, Muslim or Jew.
    Further, I find it morally reprehensible that any religion pretends to know what’s best for society when they can’t even agree on doctrine with-in their own ranks. So, no. Until they get their own houses in order, they have no business meddling in politics.

    • Like
    • Report

    6 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    Anonymous

    I think it brings Church and State too close together

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by MrJosh on December 11th, 2009
    voted: No

    MrJosh

    While my vote is not, I freely support their right to do whatever they desire, however, if you want to speak politically, pay taxes.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Should Religious Leaders Be Able to Endorse Political Candidates?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Religious institutions can t support political candidates
Non proft can t endorse political
Religious leaders should not be politician
How can non profit unions endorse politicians
To what degree should religious leaders intervene in political power