should producers of movies, such as little miss sunshine, which sexualize children be prosecuted as child pornographers?

Comments

• People are such alarmist now, you can't even compliment a photo of a child, with about scrutiny.

  • Report
  

  by Gen.ButtNaked on June 16th, 2011

• amazing hm?
  I enjoyed the movie a lot. Porn never came to my mind. Mind you I dislike porn nor ever indulge in it.
  first I had to laugh about the Q, then I thought " what the ...."
  lolol

  • Report
  

  by Shunyata on June 16th, 2011

• fwuffy sez: Actually there are many who do see that movie in a "negative" light, and claim that such is 'catering' to pedophiles and many camps see it as the same as "child abuse" and that such is sexualizing young girls. So believe it or not there are critics who spoke out against the movie as borderline child porn.

  • Report
  

  by chloe1971 on October 17th, 2011

• Chloe I saw in this movie the love of the grandpa to his grandchild, who was all but pretty. He did everything to boost her already bruised ego. There was nothing in it which showed grandpa's interest in her sexually. He played an old man who did his best to help his grand daughter to feel better about herself.
  in his ignorance he picked this ridiculous act/song, which actually was a combination of sad and funny ( tragic commic).

  • Report
  

  by Shunyata on October 27th, 2011

Comments

Comments

Comments

• Fwuffy sez: which one was I watching? The one where young girls were at a pageant, which -more often than you think- are said to be abusive to young girls and catering to pedophiles. and believe it or not ad's have been attacked and rated as too graphic; and thus considered as child porn. (there are court cases) The calvin klein ad as one of MANY examples of two boy in underwear was pulled as kiddy porn. TRUE. and child porn laws (which are absurd)attack virtually any child image they so deem as 'too' graphic. So this is put in its proper context. [look up; 'the perverse law of child pornography'}

  • Report
  

  by chloe1971 on October 17th, 2011

Comments

• Fwuffy sez: which one was I watching? same as everyone, which -more often than you think- are said to be abusive to young girls and catering to pedophiles. ad's have been attacked and rated as too graphic; and thus considered child porn. (there are court cases) A calvin klein ad as one of MANY examples of two boy in underwear was pulled as kiddy porn. TRUE. and child porn laws (which are absurd)attack virtually any child image they so deem as 'too' graphic. So this is put in its proper context. [look up; 'the perverse law of child pornography'} P.S. have you taken the time to read any critics reviews on the Movie? according to the 'experts' nothing is 'misread' - the movie was attacked as not appropriate for many reasons and in the public library a parent scratched > "R" rated NOT FOR KIDS on the cover.

  • Report
  

  by chloe1971 on October 17th, 2011