Assuming homosexuals are are born that way,is homosexual act ok for them,but only considered a "sin" when performed by straight people?

Comments

Comments

Comments

• Do you realize that not everyone is born the same?
  That there is actually a variety of human beings out there?
  Damn, the stupidity of some people.

  • Report
  

  by Magenta on January 9th, 2012

• Scientifically speaking, there's no "homosexual" gene, genius. Being homosexual may bw partly attributed to a tendency in that direction, but it still requires a decision.
  
  Your problem is having too little knowledge and being arrogant enough to call someone stupid because you disagree.
  
  That makes you narrow-minded which is worse than being "stupid".

  • Report
  

  by her_thrall on January 10th, 2012

• Scientifically speaking, you are not a scientist, and have no clue WHAT you are talking about.
  
  And yes, technically, I AM a genius.
  
  First, there never was any claim that there is a "gay gene" beyond the ill-informed media. Genetics does not work like that- there are hardly any traits based on a single gene, instead there are groups of genes working in tandem. Often, a complex trait like left-handedness, can be triggered by various different combinations of genes, not just one.
  
  And BTW- there is a strong correlation between left-handedness and homosexuality.
  
  And, homosexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality and asexuality- the four sexual orientations, are defined as what sex someone DESIRES, NOT physical activity.
  
  So your statement:
  "Being homosexual may bw partly attributed to a tendency in that direction, but it still requires a decision."
  
  Is false, because being homosexual is the TENDENCY itself.
  All that requires a decision is if someone lives an honest and open life, or if they live a life of repression and denial.
  
  And then you say this little gem:
  "Your problem is having too little knowledge and being arrogant enough to call someone stupid because you disagree. That makes you narrow-minded which is worse than being "stupid"."
  
  
  Listen- this whole conversation started because you made the incredibly stupid statement that if SOME people were born homosexual, that NO ONE would be heterosexual.
  
  Then, you piled on more ignorance after that.
  
  Read your own words- your problem is you have NO knowledge, and a whole lot of arrogance.
  
  Because of your lack of knowledge, you make stupid statements- not disagreements of opinion, but blatantly stupid statements.
  
  No, it is not "narrow-minded" to realize when someone else is stupid.
  
  It IS narrow-minded to think your stupidity is a replacement for scientific knowledge.
  
  Have you learned something today?
  
  No, of course not- your arrogance prevents anything from challenging your stupidity.

  • Report
  

  by Magenta on January 10th, 2012

Comments

Comments

Comments