Debate

How Can the Republican Party Regain Power?

Christmas came early for the Democratic Party in 2008. After reclaiming the White House, picking up a majority in the Senate and expanding their majority in the House of Representatives, the Democrats are in a prime position of power. This has left Republicans contemplating their strategy for the future. What must the GOP do in order to rise above the blue majority and restore their former glory?

Embed

GOP Must Win With Inclusion

By: Log Cabin Republicans

Fight Against Gay Marriage Will Lead GOP Over a Cliff



By Patrick Sammon, President of Log Cabin Republicans

Republicans are making a huge mistake if they use results from California’s Prop 8 to justify a lurch to the right on social issues. Voters narrowly passed the proposition that rolled back marriage equality for gay and lesbian Californians. 

Prop 8 passed because the “Yes” campaign changed the subject and scared voters with false information. It alleged threats to religious freedom and school curricula, despite the facts that no church would be required to marry a gay couple and each local school district controls its own curriculum. By distorting the truth, the “Yes” campaign played to decades-old fears that gay and lesbian people seek to “convert” children and are hostile to religious freedom.

Funding by the Mormon Church is the main reason Prop 8 passed.  News reports say members of the LDS church provided at least $20 million of the “Yes” campaign’s $35 million, helping sway 70 percent of African-Americans to vote “Yes,” compared with 53 percent of Latinos, and 49 percent support from whites. It’s painfully ironic that a religious denomination that faced terrible discrimination spent $20 million to promote discrimination against gay and lesbian families.

The Larger War for Equality Continues



Considering the “Yes” side of Prop 8 received 1.5 million more votes than Sen. McCain, it’s clear many Obama supporters voted in favor of discrimination. Some social conservatives say the GOP can attract these voters by focusing on gay marriage. But California’s 61-percent support of Obama proves otherwise. Just because a Democrat or Independent opposes marriage equality doesn’t mean he or she will support a Republican candidate who shares their view on that issue. 

While we lost an important battle in California, the larger war for equality continues. Make no mistake, momentum is on our side.  Eight years ago, a similar measure in California passed by a margin of 22 percent. This year, it was only four points. We are winning the future: 61 percent of those under age 30 voted “No.” Even among Republicans, support for relationship recognition is increasing. A CBS News poll of 2008 RNC delegates showed 49 percent support for either marriage equality or civil unions.

What Does All This Mean for the GOP’s Future?



What does all this mean for the GOP’s future? Inevitably, social conservatives will try to push the GOP further right on divisive wedge issues. Such efforts reflect an intrusive ideology of “Big Government” that has led the GOP over a cliff. Pursuing it further will turn the GOP into a regional party competitive only in the South and Midwest. Instead, let’s demonstrate the success of our core principles in tackling the economic crisis, preserving a strong national defense, and reforming our entitlement programs. By focusing on the real concerns of voters, the GOP will appeal to conservatives, libertarians and moderate voters.   

Out of our Party’s election defeat, we can rebuild the GOP on inclusive, conservative and libertarian principles such as limited government, fiscal restraint, personal responsibility and freedom.  Like Ronald Reagan, we must focus on kitchen table issues, not divisive social issues. We need to be a Party of the future, not of the past.

Protect the Environment

By: Republicans for Environmental Protection

Republicans Must Rediscover the Ethic of Stewardship



The battle for the Republican Party’s future has begun.

The scraping sounds of blade stropping can be heard as GOP factions prepare for the battle over what the party should stand for.

In order for Republicans to get their bearings and regain the voters’ trust, they must learn the right lessons from the 2008 election. A sure way back is to rediscover the ethic of stewardship. A steward is a caretaker, entrusted with the responsibility of looking after what 20th century conservative political theorist Russell Kirk called "the permanent things.”

Such as the environment, which supplies essential services that enable our society, with all its freedom and abundance, to thrive. Many in the Republican Party, the ancestral home of America’s conservation movement, have a bad habit of giving the bum’s rush to legitimate environmental concerns. That’s a habit that they must break, for reasons of both politics and principle.

Hostility to Environment Concern is Betrayal of Conservative Tradition



As conservative commentator Rod Dreher wrote recently in the Dallas Morning News: “The GOP's knee-jerk hostility to environmental concerns is not only a betrayal of conservative tradition but also costs Republicans credibility with young voters.”

The tradition about which Dreher wrote is the philosophical rootstock of conservatism, which in many ways has been forgotten or, worse, twisted into a grotesque caricature.

Conservatism as it is widely defined today is not your father's conservatism. It is your grandfather's. As first articulated by British statesman Edmund Burke and further refined by Kirk and other 20th century writers, traditional conservatism is an ethic of moral responsibility to the society of which free individuals are a part, including unborn generations whose prospects are in our hands.

Decades before environmental stewardship emerged as a public policy issue, Burke laid the philosophical groundwork for the conservative ethic of stewardship by likening society to an intergenerational contract. The present generation is obligated to take good care of what has been inherited from past generations. It is a trust responsibility to future generations.

Rediscovering the Intellectual Heritage of Conservatism



Conservatism is not a fixation on pleasing big business, maximizing material gain, and looking out for number one. Traditional conservatism demands responsible exercise of freedom, lest it become license, and avoiding egotistical utopian thinking that ignores human fallibility. Piety towards creation and valuing natural beauty are fundamental to maintaining an orderly society that nurtures freedom and dignity.

Good conservatives are good stewards. New life for conservatism and its political home in the Republican Party will be found by rediscovering the intellectual heritage of conservatism. That’s the pole star that must guide a shell-shocked Republican Party towards a new vision founded on old truths.

Answers. 0 helpful answers below.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Related Ads