|
|
Pros and Cons About Legalizing Marijuana
Monday, September 07, 2009
InstructionsBoth Sides' Most-Convincing ArgumentsStep 1: Negative answers to the question "Would you want your children to be smoking marijuana?" are the most convincing arguments of those who oppose the legalization of marijuana. For legalization, the monetary argument is most convincing, where estimates are made both on potential law-enforcement savings and on potential revenues generated from taxes on growing, producing and consuming marijuana. These "pros" hold that because most lawbreakers caught using marijuana only get a "slap on the wrist" anyway, savings and revenues might as well be realized.
Health ArgumentsStep 1: The anti-legalization side argues marijuana is addictive and a health hazard, eliciting a pro-legalization argument that counters "only if taken frequently and in large doses." The "antis" cite studies linking the drug to cancer, respiratory problems, heart attack and damage to the immune system, noting that short-term hazards include memory loss, distorted perception and loss of motor skill. The "pros" say marijuana helps increase appetite and relieve symptoms of glaucoma, with the antis countering there are better drugs for these. Proponents for legalization argue that if marijuana is grown legally, cures for other ills could be found.
Hazards to OthersStep 1: Antis argue that marijuana is a hazard not only to users but also to those around them, just as second-hand tobacco smoke is. They cite statistics linking marijuana usage to crime and to driving accidents, saying marijuana affects the ability to concentrate, stay alert, coordinate and react, making it difficult to judge distances, read signs and react to signals. The pros argue that the same happens with consumption of alcohol and at times with tobacco smoking, both of which are legal.
Following Tobacco and AlcoholStep 1: Pros say limitations on alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking can also be imposed on marijuana use. As with alcohol, an age limit can be imposed on minors. And as with tobacco smoking, there can be restricted-use locales as well as mandated labels on packaging citing marijuana's potential health dangers. The antis counter that alcohol and tobacco are not as dangerous and do not lead to deadlier drugs later in life, alleging as well that proponents for legalization aim to get the stronger drugs legalized later.
Gateway ArgumentsStep 1: Antis cite studies proving few users of drugs (other than marijuana) have done so without first having tried marijuana. They conclude marijuana leads to use of more dangerous, stronger and harder drugs and substances like cocaine and heroin. Pros argue that not all marijuana users end up using the stronger drugs and not all users of stronger drugs have even tried marijuana. The antis counter that marijuana takes away inhibitions to drug use and promotes a culture allowing use of other drugs.
Related Content
For decades, the legal status of marijuana has been highly controversial. The Drug War rages on, and although pot is still considered a drug, people are still doing it. Many people still fight...
Marijuana has long been illegal for almost all intents and purposes in the United States. This is due to a variety of arguable factors, many of which center around the fact that marijuana was never...
The legalization of marijuana, although controversial in the United States, could lead to many economic and safety benefits, and would take power away from violent drug cartels that currently run...
Cannabis, more commonly known as marijuana, is a psychoactive drug made from the cannabis plant and used recreationally all over the world for the calming and pleasurable effects of its key...
A hotly debated issue, marijuana use, and the prospects for its legalization, have both pros and cons. From bodily effects to use in medicine, marijuana runs the gamut in its uses and possibilities...
|
- Relationship advice
- Brain teasers, trivia & jokes
- Random questions
- And much more!
go