Ask a Question
or
Create a Poll
  1. Home /
  2. Questions /
  3. Social Sciences
  4. / Politics And Modern Events
  5. / More Politics And Modern Events

by freeluncher on November 21st, 2007

freeluncher

Question

Help answer this question below.

Instead of a war, where poor young people lose their limbs and lives for little or no reward, would you support instead a bare-knuckle fight to the death between the leaders of America, Israel, UK, China, Russia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and Bin Laden?

  • Like
  • Report
Share:
Other

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by jTads on April 25th, 2010

    jTads

    Well the reality of the situation is that we are all part of a giant video game and the world leaders of the real world are playing a giant game similar to "Command & Conquer" They think they are resolving things peacefully, but it is us in the video game world who suffer. Unfortunately unlike the matrix, we are just highly advaced programs, not people at all, so we cannot be removed except through death.

    A bit more seriously though... if you are so against war... why would a fistfight be better? Why not a nice game of Shogi or Go? Even Chess? How would Bin Laden get involved? He's not a world leader. At least not politically. He's just a guy who would encourage people to burn down other people's homes while these fights were going on.

    Comments

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Instead of a war, where poor young people lose their limbs and lives for little or no reward, would you support instead a bare-knuckle fight to the death between the leaders of America, Israel, UK, China, Russia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and Bin Laden?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

Answerbag

a Demand Media company