- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Yes, I will as soon as you give me scientific and physical proof that it was a controlled demolition.
Why is ground zero called that?
by Answerbag Staff on March 26th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Where can I go to find out the truth about 9/11?
by I gave her a wink and a smile on September 29th, 2011
| 2 people like this
True or false? World Trade Center Bldg 7 - which was not hit, but fell anyway - had all the records for the gov to use to prosecute Enron.
by purplecows on December 19th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Lloyd's insurer sues Saudi Arabia for 'funding 9/11 attacks Does this give you pause? How so?
by Wynper on September 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why was 9/11 an inside job?
by Have A Nice Day on October 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Debate me 9/11/01, building seven, i say controlled demolition. explain why i'm wrong and give scientific proof, please.
Comments
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=152551442&blogId=354948246
by da truth on November 3rd, 2009
No, not some blog from someone you think is an authority. I want to see evidence, solid evidence. Not speculation. Not theory.
by Baggins on November 3rd, 2009
it's a video
by da truth on November 4th, 2009
Yes, and all that video says to me is the massive quantities of air in the buildings was pushed out with unimaginable force as the top of the building was collapsing. Air has to go somewhere. Next?
by Baggins on November 4th, 2009
okay then how did two planes take down three buildings and make all three of them fall straight down into there foundation?
by paulcnumber3 on February 11th, 2010
Two planes dropped the two large buildings and the third building collapsed after being damaged by the said two large buildings collapsing. Third building caught fire and subsequently lost structural integrity and collapsed. Next?
by Baggins on February 11th, 2010
and they all so happened to fall directly into the own foundation? and the fires temp. got so hot it burned for 5 days straight with continuous water being poured on it now how could it get that hot without nano thermite or some type of other explosive and even if nothing was used.... it is very highly unlikely that were being told the whole truth 3 buildings don't just fall into there own foundation it was just a reason to go get some oil and if you cant see that then there's something wrong to you
by paulcnumber3 on February 13th, 2010
Okay, idiot! Whatever you say. Believe what you want! I'm not going to change your mind and you're certainly not going to change mine. Read the Popular Science debunking your "theory" with fact. And know THIS for a fact.....a truck tanker full of gasoline wrecked under a massive reinforced concrete overpass in the SF bay area a couple of years ago and the overpass collapsed from the heat. It is a fact that a fire can get so hot that it seriously effects the integrity of the strongest steel. But you can believe your conspiracy-minded leaders over a very high cliff for all I care. BBye.
by Baggins on February 13th, 2010
yes sir calling me an idiot proved me wrong... you know you just cant answer my question so you have to resort to making fun of me im not saying that steel and concrete cant be compromised by heat but an overpass is mad totally different then a building are you really that blind to not see that something weird happened and were not getting the full information im not saying the government did it or anything im trying to get u to think outside the box look at all the red flags... buildings falling into fondation,pentagon videos, bush's slow reaction to leaving the school house,going to war then changing it and going to a diff war not even involved... if u wanted me to i could literally keep going... but like you said you wont change my beliefs and i wont change yours
by paulcnumber3 on February 14th, 2010
BBye!
by Baggins on February 14th, 2010