- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
You're kidding, right?
The terrorists would then just not stay in their seats when they took over the plane - I doubt that they do now.
--
Ejector seats for the passengers would not be practical . First of all ejecting at 25,000 feet would land them in a frigid oxygen-deprived atmosphere. They would lack oxygen masks and parachutes, not to mention the training about how to eject safely and parachute without too much damage to themselves and others. Secondly, with all that 'open air ventilation' in the roof of the plane the pilot and other crew would be pretty hard pressed to continue flying the craft safely.
Not to mention that infants and toddlers, who are stapped into car seats for the ride would be shot out of the plane to their deaths - do you want to be responsible for that?
At what altitude do you need FAA permission?
by Answerbag Staff on April 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Are crochet needles allowed on airplanes?
by Answerbag Staff on April 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
How long is the flight from china to san diego?
by Answerbag Staff on April 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
At 1350 mph, how would one determine the fuel consumtion ratio of a Concord SST?
by Anonymous on May 8th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is the weight of a gallon of TS-1 jet fuel?
by losttoday on January 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why don't normal commercial planes have ejecter seats controlled by the pilot? Surely this would be ideal in a terrorist situation?
Comments
Actually I meant for the passengers. If all the passengers got ejected then the terrorist standing up would be blown out the plane?
by TheGreatOne on August 10th, 2006
He's right. The odds of passengers surviving an ejection at altitude are really poor. They would both freeze and suffocate.
by Glenn Blaylock on August 10th, 2006