- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
No he is NOT, as a matter of fact by doing so he opens the STATE up for a series of law suits which can be a lot more costly in the long run, there is already laws on the books concerning these types of cases depending on the circumstaces of the person in question the court is NOT there to inflict "PAIN and SUFFERING" on anyone that comes before it, the courts job is to seek a fair and just resolution to what ever the problem is and do it in a manner that both parties can leave in a peaceful manner after words in other words it is resolved to the satisfaction of both parties involved ..
~Nemo~
What is the easiest way to prevent my ex-wife from being able to make any claims against my Social Security benefits and/or my estate when I die?
by deadduderc on August 6th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
My ex filed Chapter 7 and I am one of his creditors, I met with an attorney last night and he said I can not hold him in contempt because he filed bankruptcy. He suggested that I wait for his bankruptcy to discharge then I should file a contempt claim?
by BlondeDreamer on August 19th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
If I get divorced and remarried in Florida and then I decide to move a country where US divorces are not recognized (such as Ireland), will the new marriage be recognized or only the first one?
by deadduderc on August 6th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
Is there a statute of limitations for fraudulent financial information submitted by the parties in a divorce. A recent discovery was made by me several years after the matter was final. as per the court.
by Anonymous on August 5th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
I have been married for 15 years. I retired from the State of Michigan. and have a pension. (27 years ) We were married in 1994 , I retired in 2002 meaning we were married for 8 years during my work as a state employee. Is my spouse entitled to my pension
by Anonymous on August 27th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Is a Circuit Court judge blameless if he exercises his discretion on a matter that he has been fully informed (expert testimony available) will cause both physical damage and financial disruption to a plaintiff? Not criminal matter.
Comments