by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on June 2nd, 2009

Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard

Question

Help answer this question below.

Why do some tout the "if it ain't King James, It ain't bible" philosophy when the original scripts of the bible were written in Hebrew, Greek, and other languages, not Olde English?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by laie_techie on June 2nd, 2009

    laie_techie

    Not to be pedantic, but the King James Version uses early Modern English, not Middle English or Old English. Beowolf was written in Old English.

    I believe each translation has its own strengths and weaknesses.

    Comments
    • Thanks for clearing that up, I was pretty sure I was wrong about the type of English. Now that you mention it, I remember trying to read Beowulf in its original form and found it very hard to do. If I remember correctly, true old english sounds a bit like modern german (I speak German). Same romantic roots, right?

      +4

      Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard

      by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on June 2nd, 2009

    • Thanks for the points. Yes, Old English (Anglo-Saxon) was a Germanic language.

      laie_techie

      by laie_techie on June 2nd, 2009

    • Thought so, thank you kindly.

      Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard

      by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on June 2nd, 2009

    • The current version of the KJV is 1769 its easier to read than the 1611 version.

      Doc

      by Doc on February 13th, 2012

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Why do some tout the "if it ain't King James, It ain't bible" philosophy when the original scripts of the bible were written in Hebrew, Greek, and other languages, not Olde English?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads