by steelhamster@aol.com on March 28th, 2007

steelhamster@aol.com

Question

Help answer this question below.

Why is birth sometimes referred to as a "miracle"? When thousands of "miracles" are born in desperate poverty every day? Could the "miracle" be that they are able to be ignored by those who hail them as such?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by KagomeShuko on March 28th, 2007

    KagomeShuko

    No matter what, life is a miracle. Other conditions don't have to do with the miracle itself.

    Science hasn't yet figured out how to create life without taking something from something that's already living - so it's a miracle.

    Comments
    • I guess having a contrary view is worthy of downrating by some.... I disagree about your view about scientists not being able to create life...

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on March 28th, 2007

    • Well, where haven't they used a seed, an egg, sperm, etc.? They can't just take dirt or tree bark and make life. . . do you have proof that they can? It'd be interesting to see. . .

      KagomeShuko

      by KagomeShuko on March 28th, 2007

    • It isnt possible to make life dirt? But life can be created in a test tube by those evil scientists however

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on March 28th, 2007

    • Really? How? With what - that isn't or wasn't already alive?

      KagomeShuko

      by KagomeShuko on March 28th, 2007

    • Budgies have chicks, cows have cows... are they also "miracles"?

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on March 28th, 2007

    • Yeah. . .those are births and life. You have no logic to your arguments. . .and thus, this is not even an argument. You prove my point with everything you say.

      KagomeShuko

      by KagomeShuko on March 28th, 2007

    • hmmm so because you believe its a miracle, it makes it so.... oh yes you make your point so lucidly... oh dear oh dear oh dear

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on March 28th, 2007

    • Kangomen, life already does come from something living. A mother and father are living humans, no? So I disagree with your view about scientists not being able to create life.

      Anonymous

      by Anonymous on July 29th, 2009

    • Now scientists can create life using artifical sperm, making men redundant, so much for miracles then.

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on August 10th, 2009

    • scientists can't create life from nonlife, therefore birth is a miracle, because babies are born from nonlife
      ...no, wait...

      purplecows

      by purplecows on August 19th, 2009

    • So scientists in a lab using a sperm and an egg, is not a miracle, but two drunken teenagers hooking up in the back seat of a Camero is a miracle?

      ConservativelyLiberal

      by ConservativelyLiberal on August 19th, 2009

    • yes, it is - awfully cramped back there

      purplecows

      by purplecows on August 21st, 2009

    • I just wait for the day when science can finally put the last nail in the coffin of religion

      steelhamster@aol.com

      by steelhamster@aol.com on August 22nd, 2009

    • It'll never get there.

      KagomeShuko

      by KagomeShuko on August 28th, 2009

    • Like
    • Report

    14 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Why is birth sometimes referred to as a "miracle"? When thousands of "miracles" are born in desperate poverty every day? Could the "miracle" be that they are able to be ignored by those who hail them as such?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads