by Jamaican on March 13th, 2007

Jamaican

Question

Help answer this question below.

If a guy get a girl pregnant, but is not financially able to support the child, and requests that the girl have an abortion, but she choses not to, should he still be sued for child support?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by Anonymous on March 13th, 2007

    Anonymous

    Believe this or not, if the father is a minor and the mother to-be is a minor, both parents can be liable for the care of the baby. yep, you heard it here folks.

    If this is not the case. financially able or not, the father will be sued in civil court for support. not financially able, in this case, means exactly what? if you are employed, the court will see that the baby is supported by you.

    Yes, it takes two to tango, but someone has to be responsible for the infant.

    It cannot support itself.

    Comments
    • You got it... whether or not the "father" of the unborn is wanting an abortion or not.. he is responsible for the child if the "mother" of the child wishes to keep it. He is also responsible for the pre-natal care as well as the 18 years after the baby is born... and like John said if the two "parents" are minors, then the minors parents are responsible until the minors reach adult statis.

      so keep it in your pants if you don't want to pay, pay, pay!!!

      tjatherton

      by tjatherton on June 3rd, 2007

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading If a guy get a girl pregnant, but is not financially able to support the child, and requests that the girl have an abortion, but she choses not to, should he still be sued for child support?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads