by steelhamster@aol.com on October 6th, 2007

steelhamster@aol.com

Question

Help answer this question below.

Did the "Right to Bear Arms" ever mean to include automatic weapons and armour piercing bullets?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by Armed and Dangerous on August 24th, 2008

    Armed and Dangerous

    I think so,the reason for this was so people could defend them selves aginst the government if things got out of control.But even if we could own machine guns how could we defend our selves from Air attacks or tanks.They would not do mutch good.

    Comments
    • They did just fine in Somalia against us. Technology has never done a good job against an armed population.

      Retired From The Internet

      by Retired From The Internet on August 11th, 2010

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Did the "Right to Bear Arms" ever mean to include automatic weapons and armour piercing bullets?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads