by go_to_hellas on February 1st, 2007

go_to_hellas

Question

Help answer this question below.

Should Jehovah's Witnesses have the right to refuse blood tranfusions for their children, and does the state have an obligation to step in?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by timetogetserious on February 3rd, 2007

    timetogetserious

    Personally i find it very difficult to justify the potential death of a child for religious reasons. With my wife being a nurse, i have heard many stories.

    I cannot see how this tradition is still upheld. Furthermore, i cannot fathom parents making these decisions for their own children when their life is on the line.

    Comments
    • Look, you live in a very glass house and are not the poster child for moral behavior so don't be so high and mighty on this one. Don't stick your penis in other women and be faithful to your marriage vow, that is more important.

      Wendora

      by Wendora on February 3rd, 2007

    • Now, now, Wendora is Gone Bye-Bye-do we have to be that rude and crude on a site where there are children reading?
      <:))))<><

      sleeppro

      by sleeppro on March 2nd, 2007

    • Bloodless medicine is superior. The blood or death scenario only occurs when there is medical incompetence.

      Ben

      by Ben on February 11th, 2010

    • Like
    • Report

    3 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Should Jehovah's Witnesses have the right to refuse blood tranfusions for their children, and does the state have an obligation to step in?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads