by LinkHogg on December 21st, 2004

LinkHogg

Question

Help answer this question below.

Would the Mormon church condone kinky or anal sex within a marriage between two devout and loving Mormons?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by science_geek on January 25th, 2007

    science_geek

    No. Sex is for procreation. It is a required duty for women to have vaginal intercourse with their husbands to further the kingdom.

    The LDS Church inserts itself into every aspect of your life if you are a member. This includes what happens in your bedroom with your spouse. I have personally experienced this.

    Comments
    • This answer is a gratuitous assertion by a person with an obvious axe to grind against the Church. He provides no proof of his assertion. He has questioned mine and my brother's integrity on numerous occasions. So, science_geek why should we believe anything you write? Where is your proof that you really no what your writing about?

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 25th, 2007

    • Does this sound like we believe sex is only for reproductions (http://tinyurl.com/28gb47)?

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 25th, 2007

    • GlennBob, you are a liar. You are intentionally deceiving people. Of course that is to be expected from people who are dedicated to following a convicted confidence man, Joseph Smith. The Axe to which you refer is due to the tremendous damage that your evil religion has caused to so many, including myself and my family. Yes, I despise you cult, it is truly the epitomy of evil on Earth and is an absolute, total scam.

      science_geek

      by science_geek on January 26th, 2007

    • I think that people can see who the liar is here. I provided a link to an article from an official Church publication that directly contradicts what you are claiming. All you have is your unsubstantiated word. You make these claims of the horrible wrong that the Church has done to you, yet you have not provided a single solid piece of evidence to back of these claims beyond your paranoid ranting.

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 27th, 2007

    • As further evidence of who is telling the truth here, let me add another link (http://tinyurl.com/2pvxvn). This takes you to one of the lesson from a lesson manual that we use to teach the teenage boys in our Church. Note the quotes from Church leaders in which they state that sex is not only for reproduction, but is also an expression of love between husband and wife. Once again, this is from a source that is freely available to anyone. All you have to do is go to the Church's website. Once again, all science-geek has is his unsubstantiated rants.

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 27th, 2007

    • Oh and science_geek accuses Joseph Smith of being a CONVICTED confidence man. If this is so, then where are the court records that show that he was convicted of this crime? They don't exist because Joseph Smith was never convicted of any such thing. Despite the numerous accusations against him, all of the false witnesses that perjured themselves, and all of the kangaroo courts before which he stood, Joseph Smith was only convicted of one "crime". That one crime was that of casting out a devil. Now, why that was considered to be a crime, I don't know, but that is the only conviction that his enemies were able to get in a court of law.

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 27th, 2007

    • Gee, GlennBob, that is also a lie. He was convicted of fleecing farmers out of their money as a gold digger using his rock in his hat. Now that you Church has the records of the case, I don't imagine that they will ever see the light of day, will they? Remember that your cult excommunicated its historians, didn't they?

      science_geek

      by science_geek on January 27th, 2007

    • Cite your sources.

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on January 27th, 2007

    • This sounds kind of weird. Does this mean birth control of any kind if forbidden or frowned on?

      Sheriff Raff  -Answerhag

      by Sheriff Raff -Answerhag on March 12th, 2007

    • Riff-Raff, not that science_geek is known for making these gratuitous assertions without offering any backup for his accusations. Note that I challenged him to cite his sources for these accusation. I did that several weeks ago. He has not done so. Note also that I provided a couple of links that directly contradict what he has asserted and the best that he has been able to do is accuse me of lying and just added more unsubstantiated accusations. He is not a trustworthy source of information about us.

      Glenn Blaylock

      by Glenn Blaylock on March 12th, 2007

    • I've NEVER had the Church try to govern things in my life like how I have sex with my wife. That sounds more like the Catholics if you ask me.

      Atillion

      by Atillion on February 14th, 2008

    • Sheriff BC is not forbidden or frowned on at all.
      Atillion I have to agree lol I dont really feel like the church is governing my life. Like Joseph Smith said "I teach them correct principles and they govern themselves."

      Oddjob

      by Oddjob on April 22nd, 2008

    • LDS couples have been counseled that sex is not only for procreation but that it is healthy, both emotionally and spiritually, for their relationship.

      I'd also like to see exactly the quote that oral sex within marriage is unnatural and sinful, because I have NEVER heard about that. Nonsense!

      missfortissimo

      by missfortissimo on August 28th, 2010

    • Like
    • Report

    13 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Would the Mormon church condone kinky or anal sex within a marriage between two devout and loving Mormons?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads