- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
If the (40 Year Old) Virgin Mary was sinless, why didn't she die on the cross?
by Want To Sleep With A Miner on November 29th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Does God talk to us in our dreams? I heard this once and am looking for opinions/thoughts.
by hothand on January 12th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Does the brain control the way we perceive reality?
by Sarrow on October 13th, 2011
| 2 people like this
WOuld an All-Powerful God™ allow the pronunciation of His Holy Name™ to be forgotten and lost?
by purplecows on December 19th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Is Napolean your hero, if for no other reason than arresting the damn Pope?
by Want To Sleep With A Miner on November 29th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading How do I know that Jesus and God are real?
Comments
good impartial answer . we try because we wish to share our insights in the debate
by Grandma Roses - my avatar is my real dog on October 16th, 2005
False conclusion. Assumes there is no experiential relationship possible with Jesus. Doesn't factor personal ignorance.
by TulsaDavid on October 12th, 2005
DO answer religious questions- it stops the categories from becoming over-biased.
by Anonymous on December 8th, 2005
This is true. Christians, prove God exists. Non christians, prove he doesn't. If it could be done, by now it would have...
by Shabba on January 10th, 2006
Just because virtually no amount of proof is enough for those set against believing in God, doesn't mean there is no proof
by Joshua Zambrano on January 28th, 2006
This is a moderately useful answer, but remember, the burden of proof is on the one making the assertion of something's existence. Your reasoning helps no one believe in your concept of God. It could be applied to Zeus belief.
by Flynn444 on September 29th, 2006
flynn, in a dichotomous argument, there are two sides, both of which make a claim. In this case 1.) that God exists, 2.) that God does not exist. The burden of proof falls on both sides. Whatever you say, you have to substantiate it.
by kingky21 on December 20th, 2006
by that same token, conclusive proof as we conceive of it does not exist for either side as bbumgardner has already stated. Don't think that just because you place your faith in something other than God, in this case, the faith-based claim that there is no God, that you do not have to justify yourself. Everyone has faith, it's just a matter of where you put it.
by kingky21 on December 20th, 2006
Do you feel the burden of proof is on you to show that Zeus doesn't exist? Thor? Allah? Purple unicorns? Sorry, but if you're going to posit the existence of a fantastic being, it's up to you show that it exists, not for the rest of us to disprove whatever your imagination conjures. Disbelief in God is no more "faith-based" than your disbelief in the Flying Spaghetti Monster. You have no evidence to believe it exists, so you don't believe. It's the same with non-theists.
by Flynn444 on December 21st, 2006
I'd just like to comment as no one would read my answer 60 posts down. God of course is your belief. (hence the word faith) no real proof but you still believe, and Jesus IS real, He was tooken on the Roman census. It's just a matter of if you believe he was the son of God.
by Final_Starman on March 8th, 2007
kingky, your statement is illogical. you are speaking from the narrow perspective of assuming that there is a god and that it's the highest priority in the universe. You're assuming that everyone else "puts their faith" somewhere other than where you put yours. That's not how it works. Everyone else has their own view of what is and isn't real, and what is and isn't important. My lack of belief in your god doesn't define me, any more than your lack of belief in leprechauns or unicorns defines you. Finalstarman, you are mistaken. There is much debate over the existence of a historical Jesus. It's not backed up by evidence outside religious texts.
by Jessicax23 on March 25th, 2007