When you have a linear graph with a positive slope the x and y variables are said to be directly proportional, what If you have a linear graph with a negative slope? Is it inversely proportional?

I thought the moderators had removed my embarrasingly incorrect answer, but it just turns out that the question is repeated. This has spurred me to look for a correct answer. In my technical field, we sometimes use the term "inversely proportional" in the situation you describe, but that is sloppy at best, and just wrong at worst. I can't find any term for the negative linear slope other than directly proportional. That term seems not to care whether the proportion is positive or negative. I would suggest the term "negatively proportional", but I can't find any mathematical source which uses it. Directly proportional is defined as y being some non-0 multiple of x, and it doesn't seem to matter if that number is positive or negative. So, for example, y = 2x and y = -2x both satisfy the definition. The equation for direct proportionality then, looks like this: y = kx, where the constant k is a rational number (whole number or fraction, positive or negative) other than 0.

Inverse proportionality, which is also called reciprocal proportionality, is expressed by y = k(1/x), which is not linear.

Comments

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Question

When you have a linear graph with a positive slope the x and y variables are said to be directly proportional, what If you have a linear graph with a negative slope? Is it inversely proportional?

Answers. Showing one answer.

Comments

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions