- NEW!
by Freddy Says remove all moderation points on February 15th, 2008
if i not submit my web site url to Google, Is google index my web site?
by princedeecoup on January 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Is there anyway to find out what program sites use to create their web site?
by linda.bertoli80@gmail.com on January 17th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Some people argue that Internet content filters are a violation of freedom. Some people say it's protection, others a hinderance. W.A.Y?
by KATTALNUVA on February 17th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Are there any directories of question-and-answer sites (ChaCha, Yahoo Answers, Mahalo Answers, etc.) on the Internet?
by Anderson_G on January 10th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What RSS reader downloads each web site's feed in a different xml file automatically and NOT in a single opml or DB file?
by andrezst1 on January 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why don't we have "Resurrection@Home," a grid-computing tool that will research new methods to resurrect those who have been dead longer & longer?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Analyze what chemicals and methods are needed to restore synaptic electricity in their brains, how to restart hormones, how to keep oxygen in brain and body longer so they can have a better chance to survive, and I could go on.
by Tondoteottotote on February 15th, 2008
You could. But how would the data be recorded? And why would it need a grid instead of any single machine?
by Freddy Says remove all moderation points on February 15th, 2008
How would we accumulate the data? Tests with simulations, that's how. The program would simulate various methods to revive the dead, and when one works with someone who's been dead for 5 minutes, we try the same method on someone who's been dead longer & longer until it doesn't work anymore, then the program tries different methods until one works, and the process keeps going, ad infinitum. More and more methods to revive anyone who's been dead for longer will be discovered, and more ways will be found to revive those who have died in different ways too- from freezing to death, to drowning, and eventually to even gunshots to the head. Quantum computers calculate so fast that one second of quantum calculation will equal ~10,000 years of normal computers' calculations. Soon, we'll be practically immortal thanks to Resurrection@Home.
by Tondoteottotote on February 15th, 2008
So none of this will actually be real data. The idea is certifiable.
by Freddy Says remove all moderation points on February 15th, 2008
"Certifiable?" It could mean more than one way. Extrapolated from real body scans, we'd know exactly how a body degrades after death. Computers will extrapolate better in a decade or so.
by Tondoteottotote on February 15th, 2008
Folding@home is probably based more on extrapolations than real data, and that's widely used, no doubt.
by Tondoteottotote on February 15th, 2008
a) Still certifiable
b) Wrong thread when you linked to folding@home -25
c) I don't care anyway
d) No-one cares
e) While alive go to a
f) Please do not get resurrected
by Freddy Says remove all moderation points on February 15th, 2008
Well, so Folding@home is still certifiable (too)? Tell that to Vijay Pande on the project's forums. Oh, and why'd you degrade to just another internet flamer just now? What has gotten into you?--> http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/600753 You're not a sockpuppet of 123mantobeat456 by any chance, are you? PS: In regards to "While alive go to a" - While alive, go to a what?
by Tondoteottotote on February 15th, 2008
If it's still certifiable, please cite sources.
by Tondoteottotote on July 29th, 2011
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES TO CITE?
by Tondoteottotote on February 25th, 2012