by Anonymous on January 8th, 2008

Anonymous

Question

Help answer this question below.

I was reading an article about smoking and it was talking about how people with families who smoked all there lives and didnt develop lung cancer etc are not likely to contract it themselves, how much truth dyu think is behind that?

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by Imnottellingyou on January 9th, 2008

    Imnottellingyou

    i think that its possible for a small precent but most unlikely for some... my mother smoked from the time she was pregnant with me and she still does and she does not have cancer... I only lived with her for 4 years then lived with another smoker for 1 and I dont have cancer but severe lung issues... i cant be around smoke without having an asthmatic reaction and if i am around it for a long period of time (a set of my grandparents smoke) i get really sick (eye, ear throat infection) so i think second hand smoke can defiently give u cancer

    Comments
    • It can't and it doesn't.
      Susceptibility to cancer is hereditary.

      Think about it: If smoking caused cancer, then every smoker would die of cancer, and no no-smoker would ever have cancer. The same goes for second-hand smoke. Thousands of non-smokers, who have never been exposed to second-hand smoke, die of lung cancer.

      Besides, lung cancer has been around atleast a thousand years longer than cigarettes.
      You figure it out.

      Sandman

      by Sandman on September 24th, 2009

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading I was reading an article about smoking and it was talking about how people with families who smoked all there lives and didnt develop lung cancer etc are not likely to contract it themselves, how much truth dyu think is behind that?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads