- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
When did America stop hanging as a punishment?
by Answerbag Staff on May 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is capital one murder?
by Answerbag Staff on July 12th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
When was hanging abolished in Britain?
by Answerbag Staff on July 10th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
In the Cases of Death Penalties, the person who Pulls the switch, injects the needle, Lowers the level, etc. Are they committing murder?
by Nats411 on April 20th, 2012
| 3 people like this
What is the best alternative to the death penalty ?
by RuairĂ_A on April 10th, 2012
| 2 people like this
You're reading Are you for or against the death penalty?
Comments
I couldn't agree more.
by Anonymous on December 19th, 2006
I think you meant as long as they are not let out ... nice answer though!!
by cami1211 on December 19th, 2006
I disagree..
by Castrate on December 19th, 2006
My favorite answer on here. I could not agree any more than I do. If I could give more points I would.
by Littlemisswallflower on December 24th, 2006
Good answer Gideon.
by joro1968 on March 18th, 2007
Maybe a good answer Gideon but tell it to the family of a five year old who has been killed by a peodophile and you will not get many votes in your favour. I very strongly disagree. Why should my and other families tax dollars go to keep these worthless creatures alive.
by Firebrand on June 8th, 2007
Firebrand, I get your point, truly. But I think a society should constantly struggle to be better than our basest feelings. I know that personally speaking, I wouldn't want my legacy or my loved one's legacy to be that of vengeance and violence. It adds nothing to the world. But we agree to disagree.
by Gideon on June 12th, 2007
Gideon - while extensive studies may have indicated the death penalty does not deter crime, it certainly does cut down on the recidivism rate. And your argument that we don't run people off the road for causing an accident, or trash their house after a burglary, or steal their money after a fraud - you are simply comparing apples and potatos. These things you referenced are crimes against property, not against people. Property can be replaced - people cannot.
by Smart2 is back! Did you miss me? on July 3rd, 2007
Smart2, you're right. But we don't rape those who rape. We don't beat those who assault. We don't torture those who abuse. Those are crimes against people. Recidivism is kept in check by life sentences and contrary to popular myth, those who receive life without parol or 50 year sentences generally never get out of prison young enough (or at all) to murder again. There's no question that execution is more final. The question is whether it's the most enlightened choice.
by Gideon on July 9th, 2007
both sides are missing the point here. WE may not do these things to criminals but we also dont lock up people when they steal from us...we have the government do it. when someone doesn't pay their mortgage, they lose their house. when someone abuses the right to have a gun, the government takes it from them. when someone is caught for DUI he loses his license. see? the issue is not what is done but who is doing it. the government has not only the right but I would say the responsibility to protect the innocent people of this country from those who would seek to do us harm and for a crime as serious as murder, the death penalty is the only true way to pay for it.
by --- on October 4th, 2008
Amen, shadows - I couldn't agree more. The ultimate penalty for the ultimate crime.
by Smart2 is back! Did you miss me? on October 7th, 2008
I agree with shadow.
by Castrate on October 7th, 2008
I find it funny how often liberals use the term progressive to mean "throwing away what is not broken for something untested"... hmm, I guess very much like apple fansboys.
by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on August 31st, 2011